Overview of dfa,nfa, cfg, pda, turing machine, Theory of Computation

Explain Theory of Computation,Overview of DFA,NFA, CFG, PDA, Turing Machine, Regular Language, Context Free Language, Pumping Lemma, Context Sensitive Language, Chomsky Normal Form, Recursively Enumerable Language,.

Posted Date: 9/3/2012 4:13:41 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Overview of dfa,nfa, cfg, pda, turing machine, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Overview of dfa,nfa, cfg, pda, turing machine, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Overview of dfa,nfa, cfg, pda, turing machine Discussions

Write discussion on Overview of dfa,nfa, cfg, pda, turing machine
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Computer has a single FIFO queue of ?xed precision unsigned integers with the length of the queue unbounded. You can use access methods similar to those in the third model. In this

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

Computer has a single unbounded precision counter which you can only increment, decrement and test for zero. (You may assume that it is initially zero or you may include an explici

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

Exercise Show, using Suffix Substitution Closure, that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 . Explain how it can be the case that L 3 . L 3 ∈ SL 2 , while L 3 . L 3 ⊆ L + 3 and L + 3 ∈ SL

Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions An ID (q 1 ,w 1 ) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) (in zero or more steps) if there is a sequence of IDs (q 1

We'll close our consideration of regular languages by looking at whether (certain) problems about regular languages are algorithmically decidable.

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem

We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed graphs in which the nodes were labeled with (k-1)-factors of alphabet symbols (along with a node labeled ‘?' and one labeled