Local suffix substitution closure, Theory of Computation

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages.

Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Closure) If L is a strictly k-local language then for all strings u1, v1, u2, and v2 in Σ* and all strings x in Σk-1 :

u1xv1 ∈ L and u2xv2 ∈ L ⇒ u1xv2 ∈ L.

The justi?cation is essentially identical to that of our original suffix substitution closure lemma. If L ∈ SLk then it is recognized by an SLk automaton. In the k-local Myhill graph of that automaton, any path from ‘?' to the vertex labeled x can be put together with any path from that vertex to ‘?' to produce a path that represents a string in L.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:32:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Local suffix substitution closure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Local suffix substitution closure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Local suffix substitution closure Discussions

Write discussion on Local suffix substitution closure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
#Your company has 25 licenses for a computer program, but you discover that it has been copied onto 80 computers. You informed your supervisor, but he/she is not willing to take an

write short notes on decidable and solvable problem


Another way of interpreting a strictly local automaton is as a generator: a mechanism for building strings which is restricted to building all and only the automaton as an inexh

how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the classroom?

The SL 2 languages are speci?ed with a set of 2-factors in Σ 2 (plus some factors in {?}Σ and some factors in Σ{?} distinguishing symbols that may occur at the beginning and en

The computation of an SL 2 automaton A = ( Σ, T) on a string w is the maximal sequence of IDs in which each sequential pair of IDs is related by |- A and which starts with the in

State & prove pumping lemma for regular set. Show that for the language L={ap |p is a prime} is not regular

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

The Universality Problem is the dual of the emptiness problem: is L(A) = Σ∗? It can be solved by minor variations of any one of the algorithms for Emptiness or (with a little le