Local suffix substitution closure, Theory of Computation

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages.

Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Closure) If L is a strictly k-local language then for all strings u1, v1, u2, and v2 in Σ* and all strings x in Σk-1 :

u1xv1 ∈ L and u2xv2 ∈ L ⇒ u1xv2 ∈ L.

The justi?cation is essentially identical to that of our original suffix substitution closure lemma. If L ∈ SLk then it is recognized by an SLk automaton. In the k-local Myhill graph of that automaton, any path from ‘?' to the vertex labeled x can be put together with any path from that vertex to ‘?' to produce a path that represents a string in L.

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 1:32:16 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Local suffix substitution closure, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Local suffix substitution closure, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Local suffix substitution closure Discussions

Write discussion on Local suffix substitution closure
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
write grammer to produce all mathematical expressions in c.

build a TM that enumerate even set of even length string over a

We have now de?ned classes of k-local languages for all k ≥ 2. Together, these classes form the Strictly Local Languages in general. De?nition (Strictly Local Languages) A langu

This was one of the ?rst substantial theorems of Formal Language Theory. It's maybe not too surprising to us, as we have already seen a similar equivalence between LTO and SF. But

We will specify a computation of one of these automata by specifying the pair of the symbols that are in the window and the remainder of the string to the right of the window at ea

how to prove he extended transition function is derived from part 2 and 3

A Turing machine is a theoretical computing machine made-up by Alan Turing (1937) to serve as an idealized model for mathematical calculation. A Turing machine having of a line of

draw pda for l={an,bm,an/m,n>=0} n is in superscript

Applying the pumping lemma is not fundamentally di?erent than applying (general) su?x substitution closure or the non-counting property. The pumping lemma is a little more complica

It is not hard to see that ε-transitions do not add to the accepting power of the model. The underlying idea is that whenever an ID (q, σ  v) directly computes another (p, v) via