Finite languages and strictly local languages, Theory of Computation

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. Nevertheless, this does not contradict the fact that every ?nite language is SLk, for some k. All it says is that the counterexamples that establish non-closure of SL under union and concatenation must involve non-?nite languages. (You should verify the fact that they do.)

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 2:06:20 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Finite languages and strictly local languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Finite languages and strictly local languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Finite languages and strictly local languages Discussions

Write discussion on Finite languages and strictly local languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Rubber shortnote

When we say "solved algorithmically" we are not asking about a speci?c programming language, in fact one of the theorems in computability is that essentially all reasonable program

Prepare the consolidated financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2011. On 1 July 2006, Mark Ltd acquired all the share capitall of john Ltd for $700,000. At the date , J

how to understand DFA ?


what exactly is this and how is it implemented and how to prove its correctness, completeness...

A finite, nonempty ordered set will be called an alphabet if its elements are symbols, or characters. A finite sequence of symbols from a given alphabet will be called a string ove

implementation of operator precedence grammer

State and Prove the Arden's theorem for Regular Expression

The objective of the remainder of this assignment is to get you thinking about the problem of recognizing strings given various restrictions to your model of computation. We will w