Finite languages and strictly local languages, Theory of Computation

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. Nevertheless, this does not contradict the fact that every ?nite language is SLk, for some k. All it says is that the counterexamples that establish non-closure of SL under union and concatenation must involve non-?nite languages. (You should verify the fact that they do.)

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 2:06:20 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Finite languages and strictly local languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Finite languages and strictly local languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Finite languages and strictly local languages Discussions

Write discussion on Finite languages and strictly local languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Proof (sketch): Suppose L 1 and L 2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A 1 = (Q,Σ, T 1 , q 0 , F 1 ) and A 2 = (P,Σ, T 2 , p 0 , F 2 ) such that L 1 = L(A 1 ) and L 2 = L(

1. An integer is said to be a “continuous factored” if it can be expresses as a product of two or more continuous integers greater than 1. Example of continuous factored integers

Another way of interpreting a strictly local automaton is as a generator: a mechanism for building strings which is restricted to building all and only the automaton as an inexh

Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

While the SL 2 languages include some surprisingly complex languages, the strictly 2-local automata are, nevertheless, quite limited. In a strong sense, they are almost memoryless

design a turing machine that accepts the language which consists of even number of zero''s and even number of one''s?

design an automata for strings having exactly four 1''s

The upper string r ∈ Q+ is the sequence of states visited by the automaton as it scans the lower string w ∈ Σ*. We will refer to this string over Q as the run of A on w. The automa

The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never l

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha