Finite languages and strictly local languages, Theory of Computation

Theorem The class of ?nite languages is a proper subclass of SL. Note that the class of ?nite languages is closed under union and concatenation but SL is not closed under either. Nevertheless, this does not contradict the fact that every ?nite language is SLk, for some k. All it says is that the counterexamples that establish non-closure of SL under union and concatenation must involve non-?nite languages. (You should verify the fact that they do.)

Posted Date: 3/22/2013 2:06:20 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Finite languages and strictly local languages, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Finite languages and strictly local languages, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Finite languages and strictly local languages Discussions

Write discussion on Finite languages and strictly local languages
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations


Another striking aspect of LTk transition graphs is that they are generally extremely ine?cient. All we really care about is whether a path through the graph leads to an accepting

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

https://www.google.com/search?q=The+fomula+n%3D%28x%3D0%29%2F%281%3D2%29.The+value+x%3D0+and+is+used+to+stop+the+algerithin.The+calculation+is+reapeated+using+values+of+x%3D0+is+in

Trees and Graphs Overview: The problems for this assignment should be written up in a Mircosoft Word document. A scanned hand written file for the diagrams is also fine. Be

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u

Find a regular expression for the regular language L={w | w is decimal notation for an integer that is a multiple of 4}