Path function of a nfa, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings:

969_Path Function of a NFA.png

This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never leaves q) and that to ?nd the set of states reached by paths labeled wσ from q one ?rst ?nds all the states q′ reached by paths labeled w from q and then takes the set of all the states reached by an edge labeled σ from any of those q′.

We will still accept a string w i? there is a path labeled w leading from the initial state to a ?nal state, but now there may be many paths labeled w from the initial state, some of which reach ?nal states and some of which do not. When thinking in terms of the path function, we need to modify the de?nition of the language accepted by A so it includes every string for which at least one path ends at a ?nal state.


Related Discussions:- Path function of a nfa

Closure properties to prove regularity, The fact that regular languages are...

The fact that regular languages are closed under Boolean operations simpli?es the process of establishing regularity of languages; in essence we can augment the regular operations

Regular expressions, The project 2 involves completing and modifying the C+...

The project 2 involves completing and modifying the C++ program that evaluates statements of an expression language contained in the Expression Interpreter that interprets fully pa

Computation of a dfa or nfa, Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transiti...

Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions An ID (q 1 ,w 1 ) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) (in zero or more steps) if there is a sequence of IDs (q 1

Path function of a nfa, The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension...

The path function δ : Q × Σ*→ P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: Again, this just says that to ?nd the set of states reachable by a path labeled w from a state q in an

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Union, Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy ...

Intuitively, closure of SL 2 under intersection is reasonably easy to see, particularly if one considers the Myhill graphs of the automata. Any path through both graphs will be a

Push down automata, Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* su...

Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* such that x ? y and xi = yi for some i, 1 = i = min(|x|, |y|) }. For your PDA to work correctly it will need to be non-determin

Automaton theory, let G=(V,T,S,P) where V={a,b,A,B,S}, T={a,b},S the start ...

let G=(V,T,S,P) where V={a,b,A,B,S}, T={a,b},S the start symbol and P={S->Aba, A->BB, B->ab,AB->b} 1.show the derivation sentence for the string ababba 2. find a sentential form

Operator p, implementation of operator precedence grammer

implementation of operator precedence grammer

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd