Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, Game Theory

This is Case of Competitive Games.

Player 2
L R
Player 1 L (60,40) (70,30)
R (65,35) (60,40)

Are either have dominant strategy? Which?
Is Solve for nash equilibrium.
Is there any other equilibrium? What is it called?
Posted Date: 11/19/2012 3:45:56 PM | Location : Germany







Related Discussions:- Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory Discussions

Write discussion on Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

GAME 5 All-Pay Acution of $10 Everyone plays. Show the students a $10 bill, and announce that it is the prize; the known value of the prize guarantees that there is no winer’s

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Suppose that the incumbent monopolist, in the previous question, can decide (before anything else happens) to make an irreversible investment in extra Capacity (C), or Not (N). If

What terms are included in the monopolistic competition? Product Differentiation: 1. The meaning of monopolistic competition and product differentiation 2. Why monopolist

Games with Sequential Moves Most students find the idea of rollback very simple and natural, even without drawing or understanding trees. Of course, they start by being able to

A simultaneous game is one during which all players build choices (or choose a strategy) while not information of the methods that are being chosen by different players. Although t

write a program in c that takes n number finite players using gambit format and output is to be all pure strategy nash equilibrium

Consider the following three games (Chicken, Matching Pennies, Stag Hunt): Chicken Player 2 Player 1 D V D -100;-100 10;-10 V -10; 10 -1;-1 Matching Pennies Pla

1. This question and the next is based on the following description. Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4}; v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4,