Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about how to do this. For this claim the assumption that the solution of each instance is unique is not necessary; but both of the others are. If you had a program that checks whether a proposed solution to an instance of a problem is correct and another that systematically generates every instance of the problem along with every possible solution, how could you use them (as subroutines) to build a program that, when given an instance, was guaranteed to ?nd a correct solution to that problem under the assumption that such a solution always exists?

Posted Date: 3/20/2013 5:58:19 AM | Location : United States

Ask an Expert

Related Discussions:- Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm Discussions

Write discussion on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm
Your posts are moderated

Write your message here..

Related Questions

Regular expressions, The project 2 involves completing and modifying the C+... The project 2 involves completing and modifying the C++ program that evaluates statements of an expression language contained in the Expression Interpreter that interprets fully pa

#titl, matlab v matlab matlab v matlab

Computation of a dfa or nfa, Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transiti... Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions An ID (q 1 ,w 1 ) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q 0 , F) (in zero or more steps) if there is a sequence of IDs (q 1

Shell script, shell script to print table in given range shell script to print table in given range

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ... proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .

Finite state automata, Since the signi?cance of the states represented by t... Since the signi?cance of the states represented by the nodes of these transition graphs is arbitrary, we will allow ourselves to use any ?nite set (such as {A,B,C,D,E, F,G,H} or ev

# Help, #Your company has 25 licenses for a computer program, but you disco... #Your company has 25 licenses for a computer program, but you discover that it has been copied onto 80 computers. You informed your supervisor, but he/she is not willing to take an

Powerset construction, As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA wit... As de?ned the powerset construction builds a DFA with many states that can never be reached from Q′ 0 . Since they cannot be reached from Q′ 0 there is no path from Q′ 0 to a sta

Myhill-nerode theorem, This close relationship between the SL2 languages an... This close relationship between the SL2 languages and the recognizable languages lets us use some of what we know about SL 2 to discover properties of the recognizable languages.

Ogdens lemma, proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand ... proof ogdens lemma .with example i am not able to undestand the meaning of distinguished position .