Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Theory of Computation

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about how to do this. For this claim the assumption that the solution of each instance is unique is not necessary; but both of the others are. If you had a program that checks whether a proposed solution to an instance of a problem is correct and another that systematically generates every instance of the problem along with every possible solution, how could you use them (as subroutines) to build a program that, when given an instance, was guaranteed to ?nd a correct solution to that problem under the assumption that such a solution always exists?

1255_Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm.png

Posted Date: 3/20/2013 5:58:19 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm Discussions

Write discussion on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
For every regular language there is a constant n depending only on L such that, for all strings x ∈ L if |x| ≥ n then there are strings u, v and w such that 1. x = uvw, 2. |u

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the classroom?

Let ? ={0,1} design a Turing machine that accepts L={0^m 1^m 2^m } show using Id that a string from the language is accepted & if not rejected .

Proof (sketch): Suppose L 1 and L 2 are recognizable. Then there are DFAs A 1 = (Q,Σ, T 1 , q 0 , F 1 ) and A 2 = (P,Σ, T 2 , p 0 , F 2 ) such that L 1 = L(A 1 ) and L 2 = L(


To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the

1. Simulate a TM with infinite tape on both ends using a two-track TM with finite storage 2. Prove the following language is non-Turing recognizable using the diagnolization

The initial ID of the automaton given in Figure 3, running on input ‘aabbba' is (A, aabbba) The ID after the ?rst three transitions of the computation is (F, bba) The p

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give