Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Theory of Computation

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about how to do this. For this claim the assumption that the solution of each instance is unique is not necessary; but both of the others are. If you had a program that checks whether a proposed solution to an instance of a problem is correct and another that systematically generates every instance of the problem along with every possible solution, how could you use them (as subroutines) to build a program that, when given an instance, was guaranteed to ?nd a correct solution to that problem under the assumption that such a solution always exists?

1255_Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm.png

Posted Date: 3/20/2013 5:58:19 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm Discussions

Write discussion on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Generate 100 random numbers with the exponential distribution lambda=5.0.What is the probability that the largest of them is less than 1.0?

As we are primarily concerned with questions of what is and what is not computable relative to some particular model of computation, we will usually base our explorations of langua

What are the benefits of using work breakdown structure, Project Management

Rubber shortnote


Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

Find the Regular Grammar for the following Regular Expression: a(a+b)*(ab*+ba*)b.

The fundamental idea of strictly local languages is that they are speci?ed solely in terms of the blocks of consecutive symbols that occur in a word. We'll start by considering lan

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn