Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Theory of Computation

Claim Under the assumptions above, if there is an algorithm for checking a problem then there is an algorithm for solving the problem. Before going on, you should think a bit about how to do this. For this claim the assumption that the solution of each instance is unique is not necessary; but both of the others are. If you had a program that checks whether a proposed solution to an instance of a problem is correct and another that systematically generates every instance of the problem along with every possible solution, how could you use them (as subroutines) to build a program that, when given an instance, was guaranteed to ?nd a correct solution to that problem under the assumption that such a solution always exists?

1255_Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm.png

Posted Date: 3/20/2013 5:58:19 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm Discussions

Write discussion on Create a general algorithm from a checking algorithm
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
Given any NFA A, we will construct a regular expression denoting L(A) by means of an expression graph, a generalization of NFA transition graphs in which the edges are labeled with

The generalization of the interpretation of strictly local automata as generators is similar, in some respects, to the generalization of Myhill graphs. Again, the set of possible s

Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xed precision unsigned integers (so each integer is subject to over?ow problems) but which has unbounded depth (so the stack itself nev

We'll close our consideration of regular languages by looking at whether (certain) problems about regular languages are algorithmically decidable.

Design a turing machine to compute x + y (x,y > 0) with x an y in unary, seperated by a # (descrition and genereal idea is needed ... no need for all TM moves)

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

Ask question #hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhMinimum 100 words accepted#

LTO was the closure of LT under concatenation and Boolean operations which turned out to be identical to SF, the closure of the ?nite languages under union, concatenation and compl

To see this, note that if there are any cycles in the Myhill graph of A then L(A) will be infinite, since any such cycle can be repeated arbitrarily many times. Conversely, if the