Computation of a dfa or nfa, Theory of Computation

Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions

An ID (q1,w1) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q0, F) (in zero or more steps)

2490_Computation of a DFA or NFA.png

if there is a sequence of IDs (q1,w1), . . . qn,wn)) in which, for all i > 1, 899_Computation of a DFA or NFA1.png

A computation of an FSA A on input w is a computation from the initial ID (q0,w) to a terminal ID: ((q0,wi, . . . , (q, ε)).

The fact that |-A is no longer partial functional implies that we can no longer speak of the computation of A on hq1,w1i. What's more, while every computation is ?nite, it is no longer true that they all take exactly |w1| steps. Computations end when they reach an ID with no successor; this can now be either because the entire input was scanned or because an ID hq, σ  wi was reached for which δ(q, σ) = ∅. Only the ?rst case represents successful processing of w1 by A; we need to be careful to distinguish "halting" computations from those that "crash".

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 2:32:51 AM | Location : United States







Related Discussions:- Computation of a dfa or nfa, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Computation of a dfa or nfa, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Computation of a dfa or nfa Discussions

Write discussion on Computation of a dfa or nfa
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions
design a tuning machine for penidrome



Rubber shortnote

what problems are tackled under numerical integration

Find a regular expression for the regular language L={w | w is decimal notation for an integer that is a multiple of 4}

Sketch an algorithm for the universal recognition problem for SL 2 . This takes an automaton and a string and returns TRUE if the string is accepted by the automaton, FALSE otherwi

The path function δ : Q × Σ* → P(Q) is the extension of δ to strings: This just says that the path labeled ε from any given state q goes only to q itself (or rather never l

A context free grammar G = (N, Σ, P, S)  is in binary form if for all productions A we have |α| ≤ 2. In addition we say that G is in Chomsky Normaml Form (CNF) if it is in bi

The SL 2 languages are speci?ed with a set of 2-factors in Σ 2 (plus some factors in {?}Σ and some factors in Σ{?} distinguishing symbols that may occur at the beginning and en