Computation of a dfa or nfa, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Computation of a DFA or NFA without ε-transitions

An ID (q1,w1) computes (qn,wn) in A = (Q,Σ, T, q0, F) (in zero or more steps)

2490_Computation of a DFA or NFA.png

if there is a sequence of IDs (q1,w1), . . . qn,wn)) in which, for all i > 1, 899_Computation of a DFA or NFA1.png

A computation of an FSA A on input w is a computation from the initial ID (q0,w) to a terminal ID: ((q0,wi, . . . , (q, ε)).

The fact that |-A is no longer partial functional implies that we can no longer speak of the computation of A on hq1,w1i. What's more, while every computation is ?nite, it is no longer true that they all take exactly |w1| steps. Computations end when they reach an ID with no successor; this can now be either because the entire input was scanned or because an ID hq, σ  wi was reached for which δ(q, σ) = ∅. Only the ?rst case represents successful processing of w1 by A; we need to be careful to distinguish "halting" computations from those that "crash".


Related Discussions:- Computation of a dfa or nfa

Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages, Theorem The class of ...

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations. The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a give

Production, How useful is production function in production planning?

How useful is production function in production planning?

Pendulum Swings, how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the c...

how many pendulum swings will it take to walk across the classroom?

Two-tape turing machine, Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG ...

Let there L1 and L2 . We show that L1 ∩ L2 is CFG . Let M1 be a decider for L1 and M2 be a decider for L2 . Consider a 2-tape TM M: "On input x: 1. copy x on the second

Non - sl languages, The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure prop...

The key thing about the Suffx Substitution Closure property is that it does not make any explicit reference to the automaton that recognizes the language. While the argument tha

Give a strictly 2-local automaton, Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give ...

Let L 3 = {a i bc j | i, j ≥ 0}. Give a strictly 2-local automaton that recognizes L 3 . Use the construction of the proof to extend the automaton to one that recognizes L 3 . Gi

Push down automata, Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* su...

Construct a PDA that accepts { x#y | x, y in {a, b}* such that x ? y and xi = yi for some i, 1 = i = min(|x|, |y|) }. For your PDA to work correctly it will need to be non-determin

Agents architecture, Describe the architecture of interface agency

Describe the architecture of interface agency

Dfa to re, c program to convert dfa to re

c program to convert dfa to re

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd