Algorithm for the universal recognition problem, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Sketch an algorithm for the universal recognition problem for SL₂. This takes an automaton and a string and returns TRUE if the string is accepted by the automaton, FALSE otherwise. Assume the automaton is given just as a sequence of pairs of symbols and that the automaton and string are both over the same language. Give an argument justifying the correctness of your algorithm.

Related Discussions:- Algorithm for the universal recognition problem

Local suffix substitution closure, The k-local Myhill graphs provide an eas...

The k-local Myhill graphs provide an easy means to generalize the suffix substitution closure property for the strictly k-local languages. Lemma (k-Local Suffix Substitution Clo

Local myhill graphs, Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-f...

Myhill graphs also generalize to the SLk case. The k-factors, however, cannot simply denote edges. Rather the string σ 1 σ 2 ....... σ k-1 σ k asserts, in essence, that if we hav

Kleene closure, One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would...

One might assume that non-closure under concatenation would imply non closure under both Kleene- and positive closure, since the concatenation of a language with itself is included

Answer, And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we...

And what this money. Invovle who it involves and the fact of,how we got itself identified candidate and not withstanding time date location. That shouts me media And answers who''v

Distinguish between mealy and moore machine, Distinguish between Mealy and ...

Distinguish between Mealy and Moore Machine? Construct a Mealy machine that can output EVEN or ODD According to the total no. of 1's encountered is even or odd.

Non deterministic finite state automaton, Automaton (NFA) (with ε-transitio...

Automaton (NFA) (with ε-transitions) is a 5-tuple: (Q,Σ, δ, q 0 , F i where Q, Σ, q 0 and F are as in a DFA and T ⊆ Q × Q × (Σ ∪ {ε}). We must also modify the de?nitions of th

Myhill-nerode, Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff...

Theorem (Myhill-Nerode) A language L ⊆ Σ is recognizable iff ≡L partitions Σ* into ?nitely many Nerode equivalence classes. Proof: For the "only if" direction (that every recogn

Kleene closure, So we have that every language that can be constructed from...

So we have that every language that can be constructed from SL languages using Boolean operations and concatenation (that is, every language in LTO) is recognizable but there are r

Synthesis theorem, Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (an...

Kleene called this the Synthesis theorem because his (and your) proof gives an effective procedure for synthesizing an automaton that recognizes the language denoted by any given r

Chomsky normal form, s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbo...

s->0A0|1B1|BB A->C B->S|A C->S|null find useless symbol?

Write Your Message!

Name

Email id

Message

Verfication Code

User Account

All Pages