Description of the context and the case

Assignment Help Project Management
Reference no: EM132183562

Assessment brief

You are required to identify three (3) situations where either a team member or a leader behaved in the following ways on a project you were working on:

- The good: exemplary project management behavior was observed
- The bad: poor project management behavior was observed
- The ugly: unacceptable project management behavior was observed

Each case can be either something you were personally involved in or observed, or something you read about.

You can use team work in your MBA.

For each ‘case' you are required to write approx. 500 words for each scenario :
1. A description of the context and the case
2. A critical reflection on why you felt the case to be ‘good', ‘bad', or ‘ugly.
3. Offer the lessons learnt for project management practice

The critical reflection should draw on the resources and material covered in Week 1 and 2 of the course. Academic referencing to source material is required. Prepare your submission as a report; including an Introduction and a Conclusion (approx. 500 words in total).
- Introduction: State the aims of the assessment
- Conclusion: Collating the lessons learnt, what have these cases taught you about project work?

Verified Expert

The report is about project management cases of good, bad and ugly. American airlines case is a good example of project management.The bad case is target entry failure into Canada and finally BP worst failure in oil spill evaluated and reflection is presented. References are given.

Reference no: EM132183562

What is average number of customer waiting to place an order

What is the average time that catalog customers must wait before their calls are transferred to the order clerk?- What is the average number of customers waiting to place an o

Outline advantages and disadvantages of each of organization

Using a brand manager structure, having product category managers, or focusing on market managers. - Outline the advantages and disadvantages of each type of organization. Wha

Demonstrate the validity of properties 1 and 2 and 3

Consider the passband basis functions defined in (8.56), where is f( t )  itself defined by (8.57). Demonstrate the validity of Properties 1, 2, and 3 of these passband basi

Describe yourself before your transformation experience

Your Transformational Story:  To complete this Shared Activity, observe the following: Describe yourself before your transformation experience.  o Describe your transforma

What is the logic for the rule of law governing

What is the logic for the rule of law governing the granting of a motion to dismiss?- Can you construct a set of facts that would have led to a successful motion to dismiss i

Main ideas and relevant details of the article

To write a summary, use your own words to express the main ideas and relevant details of the article you have read.Your purpose in writing the summary is to give the basic i

Draw a simple flow chart for processing changes

How should the project budget and expenditures be set out for cost control? Draw a simple flow chart for processing changes? How did EID handle their risks? Was this effective

Find out how sustainable you in your organization

Considering procurement in your organization or one that you are familiar with and find out how sustainable (as per the definition of sustainability) you consider it to be f

Reviews

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:59:11 PM

In-text referencing and reference list follows Harvard style and consistent with KBS guidelines. Several sources are unacknowledged. Major errors in format of references. Acknowledged most sources in the text and reference list. Some references in the correct format. Acknowledged most sources in the text and reference list. Most references in the correct format. Acknowledged all sources in the text and in reference list. All references in correct format. Acknowledged all sources in the text and in reference list. All references in the correct format.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:59:06 PM

Format of answer consistent with question requirements and KBS guidelines. Word count is within + / - 10% of requirement. Does not comply with KBS guidelines. Major layout errors. Breaches word limit restrictions. Mostly compliant with KBS guidelines. Basic formatting with some layout errors. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Complies with KBS guidelines. Format generally sound. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format portrays information well. Compliant with word limit restrictions. Exceeds basic compliance with KBS guidelines. Format presents information clearly and concisely. Compliant with word limit restrictions.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:59:01 PM

Correct academic writing style used, including correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. Writing style is unclear; lacks logical flow and structure; numerous spelling grammatical errors. Writing style lacks some clarity; some flaws in logical flow and structure; some use of discipline specific academic language. Several spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is mostly clear; Mostly written in discipline specific academic language; Some spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Correct use of discipline specific academic language. Some minor spelling or grammatical errors. Writing style is clear; Fluent use of discipline specific academic language. No spelling or grammatical errors.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:58:56 PM

Report clearly and logically presented. Appropriate theory and research used to answer question posed. Lacks logical flow and structure; Argument supported by theory sourced from non-academic literature. No discussion of academic research. Cites very few sources. Some errors in logical flow and structure; Argument supported by basic discussion of relevant theory sourced from a minimal number of academic sources. Little if any discussion of relevant research. Generally sound logical flow and structure; Argument supported by broad discussion of relevant theory sourced from academic literature. Relevant research acknowledged but not discussed. Cites several academic sources. Very good logical flow and structure; Argument supported by detailed discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous academic sources. Excellent logical flow and structure; Argument supported by comprehensive discussion of relevant theory and research sourced from numerous quality academic sources.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:58:51 PM

Conclusion integrates the cases and makes connections with previous experience and course learning. The conclusion does not integrate the cases or articulate any connection to other learning or experiences. The conclusion attempts to integrate the cases and articulate connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning experiences, or personal goals, but the connection is vague and/or unclear. The conclusion adequately integrates the cases and provides some connections from this course to previous learning and experience The conclusion integrates the cases and articulates connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning experiences, and/or future goals. The conclusion integrates the cases and articulates multiple connections between this learning experience and content from other courses, past learning, life experiences and/or future goals.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:58:47 PM

Analysis The reflection does not move beyond a description of the learning experience. The reflection attempts to analyze the learning experience but the value of the learning to the student or others is vague and/or unclear. The reflection analyses many of the learning episodes and makes several connections to how the learning can be applied to self or others The reflection is an analysis of the learning experience and the value of the derived learning to self or others. The reflection is an in- depth analysis of the learning experience, the value of the derived learning to self or others, and the enhancement of the student’s appreciation for the discipline.

len2183562

12/2/2018 9:58:42 PM

Assessment Marking Rubric Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49% P (Pass) 50%-64% CR (Credit) 65%-74% D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Reflective Thinking The reflection does not address the student’s thinking and/or learning. The reflection attempts to demonstrate thinking about learning but is vague and/or unclear about the personal learning process. The reflection captures many of the key learning issues and captures some of the influences on personal learning. The reflection explains the student’s thinking about his/her own learning processes. The reflection explains the student’s own thinking and learning processes, as well as implications for future learning.

Write a Review

 
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd