Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
The Doctrine of 'Ultra Vires':
The doctrine of ultra vires is a legal rule that was articulated by the House of Lords in the case of Ashbury Rail, Carriage and Iron Co Ltd v Riche (22) to the effect that, where a contract made by a company (usually by the directors on its behalf) is beyond the objects of the company as written in the company's memorandum of association, it is beyond the powers of the company to make the contract. The contract is void, illegal and unenforceable. Lord Cairns stated in an obiter dictum that such a contract cannot be ratified even by the unanimous consent of all the shareholders of the company. His Lordship observed that any purported ratification would mean that "the shareholders would thereby, by unanimous consent, have been attempting to do the very thing which, by Act of Parliament, they were prohibited from doing".
Explain the principle of absolute immunity The absolute immunity principle gradually eroded and restrictive immunity approach was followed. However, many developing countries r
V alues Basic convictions or beliefs which are specific behaviors and out- comes are more desirable compare to others. Values are judgmental in which they include our ideas
What is the difference between the plain meaning and the liberal approaches to the interpretation of contracts? Provide me with an example of each to show me you understand the dif
Q. Pooling of assets and liabilities? In 2004 the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee proposed that assets and liabilities of companies be aggregated and creditors paid
Consideration must move from the promise - Law of Contract Conversely the rule that "consideration must move from the promisee" means such only a person who has personally giv
JURISDICTION According to Peter Stephen Du Ponceau, an international lawyer from Philadelphia, Jurisdiction, in its most general sense means; "The power to make, declare, o
Issuing shares at a discount: In Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India Ltd v Roper (45) the House of Lords held that it is illegal for a limited company to issue its shares at a dis
Authority of Precedent - Statement of Salmond There writing on the authority of the precedent Salmond has stated as follows like; "The importance of judicial precedent has
Interpretation of Constitution - High Court After then under Section 67(1) of the Constitution gives that whether any question as to the interpretation of the constitution ari
Had France adopted OECD convention on bribery ahead of these transactions would the firm''s behavior have differed?why?
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd