Should you employ this pointer in the constructor?, C/C++ Programming

Assignment Help:

Should you employ this pointer in the constructor?


Related Discussions:- Should you employ this pointer in the constructor?

Minimum shelf, At a shop of marbles, packs of marbles are prepared. Packets...

At a shop of marbles, packs of marbles are prepared. Packets are named A, B, C, D, E …….. All packets are kept in a VERTICAL SHELF in random order. Any numbers of packets with thes

Program that implements a digital clock, Write C code for a program that im...

Write C code for a program that implements a digital clock (HH:MM:SS). The clock includes a two-digit hour indicator HH (00-23), a two-digit minute indicator MM (00-59), and a t

Opp, what is oops

what is oops

Define array of structures, Define Array of Structures? An Array of Str...

Define Array of Structures? An Array of Structures is an assortment of the same data types which are declared as structures. It is useful to store large and different number of

Loan negotiation is usually not a straightforward ta, Ask question #Minimum...

Ask question #Minimum 1Loan negotiation is usually not a straightforward task. A type of loan is the discount installment loan. This type of loan has the following characteristics.

Decode the given code, write c++ program to decode the given code. in mobil...

write c++ program to decode the given code. in mobile keypad the integers from 1 to 9 will display the characters from a to z and 0 will assign a space

Write a program to calculate the timetable, Write a program to calculate th...

Write a program to calculate the timetable for numbers 1 -> 10 and display them as follows. Your solution should use for do loops      #include stdio.h void main() {    char p

Functions and stack frame, Each function has its own stack frame between %f...

Each function has its own stack frame between %fp and %sp. Let Caller calls Callee. Then Caller's %sp becomes callee's %fp, and callee's %sp set to be a new value (a smaller one be

Explain the switch construct, The Switch Construct The switch statement...

The Switch Construct The switch statement is a multi-way decision-making construct that tests an expression matches one of a number of constant values, and branches accordingly

Define the category of function - computer programming, Define the Category...

Define the Category of Function? A function, depending on whether arguments or parameters are present or not and whether a value returned or not, may belong to one of the foll

3/15/2013 6:02:15 AM

A: Some of people feel you must not use the pointer in a constructor since the object is not fully formed yet. Though, you can use this in the constructor (in the {body} and even in the initialization list) if you are careful.

Here is something which always works: the {body} of a constructor (or a function called from the constructor) can access reliably the data members declared in a base class and/or the data members declared in the constructor''s own class. It is because all of those data members are guaranteed to have been completely constructed by the time the constructor''s {body} starts executing.

Here is something which never works: the {body} of a constructor (or a function called from the constructor) can''t get down to a derived class via calling a virtual member function i.e. overridden in the derived class. If your aim was to obtain to the overridden function in the derived class, you won''t obtain what you wish. Note down that you won''t get to the override in the derived class independent of how you call virtual member function: explicitly via the this pointer (for example this->method()), implicitly using this pointer (for example method()), or even calling some other function which calls the virtual member function onto your this object. The bottom line is this: even if the caller is building an object of a derived class, throughout the constructor of the base class, your object is not still of that derived class.

Here is something which sometimes works: if you pass any data members in this object to another data member''s initialize, you have to ensure that the other data member has already been initialized. You can determine whether the other data member has (or has not) been initialized by using some straightforward language rules which are independent of the particular compiler you''re utilizing. The bad news is that you ought to know those language rules (for example: base class sub-objects are initialized first (look up the order if you have multiple and/or virtual inheritance!), then data members described in the class are initialized in the order wherein they appear in the class declaration). If you don''t know about these rules, then don''t pass any data member from the object (regardless of whether or not you use explicitly this keyword) to any other data member''s initializer! And if you do know about the rules, be careful please.

 

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd