Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
THE SETTING Country X is blessed with large reserves of natural resources, spectacular physical landscape and a moderate climate. It is inhabited by a well educated and industrious workforce and has a parliamentary form of democracy. The people in the country enjoy an impressive standard of living. Some concerns are however emerging about the current state of the economy (Annexure 1 provides select information about broad economic settings for the country). The main factors that seem to have contributed to these concerns include: excessive reliance on primary commodities; perceptible shifts in international trade patterns - from primary commodities to high value-added products and services, low business and consumer confidence, low personal savings, inadequate productive investments, large national debt, disproportionately high imports, and a global economic downturn. The future economic prospects for the country do not look promising unless some concerted measures are taken to rectify the situation. While several such measures (let us call them ‘proposals') are presently being considered by the government, a general consensus appears to be building around two proposals - Proposal A and Proposal B. Both proposals relate to investing in the infrastructure sector. Each of these proposals is likely to cost $40bn (2012 prices). Further, the government has decided that these projects will be implemented in joint (i.e., public-private) partnership. The underlying argument behind these investment proposals is that they will stimulate economic activity and affect economic outcome in a multiplicative manner. These proposals have generated considerable community-wide interest. And rightly so. The investments are large and their economic and societal implications are likely to be significant too. A careful evaluation of these proposals is therefore necessary. In view of the renown of UTS MEM graduates, you have been invited to evaluate these proposals. You, of course, accept the invitation! Task Your task is simply to summarize (in your own hand-writing) the results of your analysis in the answer-sheet provided separately (you would be pleasantly surprised to re-discover how elegantly you are still able to write!).
Notes:
Q. Based on the case study, answer the following question: Can currency boards make low-inflation policies credible? Answer: Currency boards have the power to bring in anti-
Are tariffs harmful are necessary to maintain fair trade?
how to start a project work on this topic
what is the free trade
Q. What is the national income identity for a closed economy? Answer: Y = C + I + G.
Question: (a) Illustrate the differences between inter and intra industry trade. (b) Foreign Investors generally tend to adopt a two-stage process when evaluating count
Q. Discuss the different types of Letters of credit? Types: i. Revocable Letter of credit ii. Irrevocable Letter of credit iii. Deferred payment Letter of credit iv. Confirmed
Assess the supply and demand of international reserves. Discuss the major determinants of the demand for international reserves: 1.) the monetary value of international transaction
Q. Describe the crisis in Russia starting from 1989. Explain why? Answer: Must emphasize lack of tax collection, legal system, corruption, organized crime, inflation, seigni
Q. Explain the credibility theory of the EMS. Answer: In this approach the other EMS countries in effect imported the credibility of the German central bank in fightin
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620
Phone: +91-977-207-8620
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd