Flaws in conventional system - inconsistent treatment, Public Economics

Assignment Help:

Flaws in Conventional System -  Inconsistent Treatment

There is inconsistent treatment of man-made and natural assets. As mentioned earlier, while computing sustainable income measures like net national product or net domestic product, the man-made machinery is depreciated so as to allow for replacement of losses in the capital stock. Man-made assets such as buildings and equipment are valued as productive capital, and are written off against the value of production as they depreciate. The inherent assumption behind this is that a consumption level maintained by drawing down the stock of capital exceeds the sustainable level of income. However, natural resource assets are not so valued and the losses in the natural resources are not similarly depreciated. Their loss entails no debit charge against current income that would account for the decrease in potential future production. For example, when forests are transferred for non-forest purposes, the national accounts record only the expenditure incurred in clearing the forests, and do not account for the loss to society as a result of this transfer. Moreover, the reduction in the forest area is shown in other volume changes, which do not have any effect on GDP.

Another misunderstanding underlies the contention that natural resources are "free gifts of nature," so that there are no investment costs to be "written off." The value of an asset is not its investment cost, but the present value of its income potential. Common formulas for calculating depreciation (e.g., straight line depreciation) by 'writing off investment costs are just convenient rules of thumb. The true measure of depreciation, which statisticians have tried to adopt for fixed capital in the national accounts, is the capitalized value of the decline in the future income stream because of an asset's decay or obsolescence. Thus, in the same sense that a machine depreciates, soils depreciate as their fertility is diminished.

A country could exhaust its mineral resources, cut down its forests, erode its soils, pollute its aquifers, and hunt its wildlife and fisheries to extinction, but measured income would not be affected as these assets disappeared. Ironically, low-income countries, which are m9ly most dependent on natural resources for employment, revenues, and foreign exchange earnings, use a system for national accounting and macroeconomic analysis that almost completely ignores their principal assets (i.e., natural assets). Underlying this anomaly is the implicit and inappropriate assumption that natural resources are so abundant that they have no marginal value. This is a misconception. Whether they enter the marketplace directly or not, natural resources make important contributions to long-term economic productivity and so are, strictly speaking, economic assets. Many are under increasing pressure from human activities and are deteriorating in quantity or quality.


Related Discussions:- Flaws in conventional system - inconsistent treatment

Policy implementation , Your organisation has tasked your to reduce the rat...

Your organisation has tasked your to reduce the rate of a particular type of incident or particular type of high risk hazards which is commonly occurring. Your task requires you to

Is heterogeneity the sole cause of conflict of interests, Q. Is Heterogenei...

Q. Is Heterogeneity the sole cause of conflict of interests? Explain heterogeneity as a cause of variation of aspirations of agents leading to formation of various special inte

Choice of mbis, Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NO...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Economics of Health Care, Deductibles and copayments are two common incenti...

Deductibles and copayments are two common incentive tools in insurance. (a)Explain which informational problems each tool primarily addresses. (b) If only one had to be used, indic

Importance of heterogeneity, Q. Importance of heterogeneity? The import...

Q. Importance of heterogeneity? The importance of heterogeneity for public policy process can be summarized in two propositions. - Heterogeneity or conflict of interests is

Improvement in seea over the sna , Normal 0 false false fal...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Pigovian approach, PIGOVIAN APPROACH   Pigou assumed  that  the aim  of...

PIGOVIAN APPROACH   Pigou assumed  that  the aim  of  social policy is  to  'promote welfare'. But  in order to simplifL  this, he chose to restrict the range of his inquiry to

impact of environmental functions , Normal 0 false false ...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Valuation tools - market prices, Normal 0 false false false...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Valuation tool - production function approach, Normal 0 false ...

Normal 0 false false false EN-IN X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd