coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Find all ne of the game, 1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determin...

1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determine which of the NE are trembling-hand perfect. 2. Consider the following two-person game where player 1 has three strategie

Auctions, what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction compris...

what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction comprised of four bidders?

Auction, A market mechanism in which a service, objects, or set of objects,...

A market mechanism in which a service, objects, or set of objects, is swapped on the basis of bids submitted by member. Auctions offer a precise set of rules that will rule the pur

Absolute auction, A general term for an English auction in which there is n...

A general term for an English auction in which there is no reserve price, guaranteeing that the object will be sold to the highest bidder regardless of the quantity of the bid.

Determine nash equilibria, Consider the electoral competition game presente...

Consider the electoral competition game presented in Lecture 6. In this game there are two candidates who simultaneously choose policies from the real line. There is a distribution

DYnamic, saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Bidding increment, A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the ...

A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the least amount above the previous bid that a new bid must be in order to be adequate to the auctioneer. For example, if the in

Dominated strategy , A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other p...

A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a smaller payoff than another strategy. Hence, a method is dominated if it's invariably

Multiple nash equilibria, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooper...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is/are the Nash Equil

Game, The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the cho...

The interaction among rational, mutually aware players, where the choices of some players impacts the payoffs of others. A game is described by its players, every player's methods,

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd