coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Single unit auction, An auction during which just one item is on the market...

An auction during which just one item is on the market for sale. Procedures embody English, Dutch, and sealed bid auctions. When multiple units are sold in one auction, the auction

Game playing in class, GAME PLAYING IN CLASS There are several games t...

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS There are several games that are appropriate for use on the first or second day of class. These games are simple but can be used to convey important poin

Find the quantities that firm is selling – equilibrium price, 1. Two firms,...

1. Two firms, producing an identical good, engage in price competition. The cost functions are c 1 (y 1 ) = 1:17y 1 and c 2 (y 2 ) = 1:19y 2 , correspondingly. The demand functi

non-credible threat , A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a p...

A non-credible threat may be a threat created by a player in a very Sequential Game which might not be within the best interest for the player to hold out. The hope is that the thr

Totally mixed strategy, A mixed strategy during which the player assigns st...

A mixed strategy during which the player assigns strictly positive chance to each pure strategy.Morgenstern, Oskar,Coauthor of Theory of Games and Economic Behavior with John von N

Nash equilibrium, A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of...

A Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash, may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. Players are in equi

sub game excellent nash equilibrium , A sub game excellent Nash equilibriu...

A sub game excellent Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium such that players' methods represent a Nash equilibrium in each sub game of the initial game. it should be found by backward

Maximization problem, Two individuals (i ∈ {1, 2}) work independently on a ...

Two individuals (i ∈ {1, 2}) work independently on a joint project. They each independently decide how much e ort ei they put. E ort choice has to be any real number between 0 and

Difference monopolistic competition and perfect competition, What is the di...

What is the different monopolistic competition and perfect competition? Monopolistic Competition versus Perfect Competition Into the long-run equilibrium of a monopolistical

Compute pure strategy and mixed strategy equilibria of game, Ronaldo (Brazi...

Ronaldo (Brazil) kicks a penalty against Casillas (Spain) in the 2006 World Cup nal. Sup- pose that Ronaldo can kick the ball to Casillas' upper left (UL), lower left (LL), upper r

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd