coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Game 3 bargaining, GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. P...

GAME 3 Bargaining Two players A and B are chosen. Player A offers a split of a dollar (whole dimes only). If B agrees, both get paid the agreed coins and the game is over. If

Ordinal payoffs, Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a...

Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the worth of the numbers isn't vital, however solely the ordering of numbers. for instance, when solving for a

Stag hunt , Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presente...

Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presented the subsequent state of affairs. 2 hunters will either jointly hunt a stag (an adult deer and rather massive meal)

What are the important forms of product differentiation, What are the impor...

What are the important forms of product differentiation? There are three significant forms of product differentiation, which are: 1. Differentiation through style or type –

Pure strategy, A pure strategy defines a selected move or action that a pla...

A pure strategy defines a selected move or action that a player can follow in each potential attainable state of affairs in a very game. Such moves might not be random, or drawn fr

Bidding ring, A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bi...

A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bids by agreeing not to bid against each other, either by avoiding the auction or by placing phony (phantom) bids.

Find all ne of the game, 1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determin...

1. Find all NE of the following 2×2 game. Determine which of the NE are trembling-hand perfect. 2. Consider the following two-person game where player 1 has three strategie

Dominant strategy equilibrium, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-c...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Dominant Strat

Mutual information, Something in a very game is Mutual information if all p...

Something in a very game is Mutual information if all players realize it. A seemingly straightforward concept, mutual information is insufficient to research most games, since it's

Borel, Borel was maybe the primary to outline the notion of games of strate...

Borel was maybe the primary to outline the notion of games of strategy. He printed many papers on poker, incorporating themes of imperfect data and credibility. Whereas his writing

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd