coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Tower defense, Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy games. T...

Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy games. The goal of tower defense games is to try to stop enemies from crossing a map by building towers which shoot at them as t

Find the quantities that firm is selling – equilibrium price, 1. Two firms,...

1. Two firms, producing an identical good, engage in price competition. The cost functions are c 1 (y 1 ) = 1:17y 1 and c 2 (y 2 ) = 1:19y 2 , correspondingly. The demand functi

Find the perfect sub game nash equilibrium, Suppose that the incumbent mono...

Suppose that the incumbent monopolist, in the previous question, can decide (before anything else happens) to make an irreversible investment in extra Capacity (C), or Not (N). If

DYnamic, saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...

saaaaaaasfffffffffffffffffffaaaczzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Green- beard, The">http://www.expertsmind.com/questions/green-beard-strateg...

The">http://www.expertsmind.com/questions/green-beard-strategy-30135520.aspx The same questions on this link.

Determine the pure strategy nash equilibria, a) Define the term Nash equili...

a) Define the term Nash equilibrium b) You are given the following pay-off matrix:   Strategies for player 1   Strategies for player 2

Cardinal payoffs, Cardinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of...

Cardinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the numbers represent some continuum of values, such as money, market share or quantity. Cardinal payoffs per

sub game excellent nash equilibrium , A sub game excellent Nash equilibriu...

A sub game excellent Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium such that players' methods represent a Nash equilibrium in each sub game of the initial game. it should be found by backward

Nash Equilibria, Two people are engaged in a joint project. If each person ...

Two people are engaged in a joint project. If each person i puts in the effort xi, the outcome of the project is worth f(x1, x2). Each person’s effort level xi is a number between

Compute pure strategy and mixed strategy equilibria of game, Ronaldo (Brazi...

Ronaldo (Brazil) kicks a penalty against Casillas (Spain) in the 2006 World Cup nal. Sup- pose that Ronaldo can kick the ball to Casillas' upper left (UL), lower left (LL), upper r

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd