coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Bidder, An auction associates who submits offers (or bids) to sale or buy  ...

An auction associates who submits offers (or bids) to sale or buy  the goods being auctioned.

Extraneous estimates, Extraneous Estimates If some parameters are identi...

Extraneous Estimates If some parameters are identified, while others are not and there exists information on their value from other (extraneous) sources, the researcher may pro

Equilibrium, An equilibrium, (or Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash) ma...

An equilibrium, (or Nash equilibrium, named when John Nash) may be a set of methods, one for every player, such that no player has incentive to unilaterally amendment her action. P

Cournot Game, I have a problem with an exercise about Cournot game. It is v...

I have a problem with an exercise about Cournot game. It is very complex and it is composed by different question and it is impossible for me to write the complete text. I need som

Evolutionary game theory, Evolutionary game theory provides a dynamic frame...

Evolutionary game theory provides a dynamic framework for analyzing repeated interaction. Originally modeled when "natural models" of fitness, a population might contains folks gen

Draw the strategic form game - nash equilibrium, 1. Consider a two-player g...

1. Consider a two-player game where player A chooses "Up," or "Down" and player B chooses "Left," "Center," or "Right". Their payoffs are as follows: When player A chooses "Up" and

Bidding increment, A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the ...

A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the least amount above the previous bid that a new bid must be in order to be adequate to the auctioneer. For example, if the in

equilibrium refinement, An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing...

An equilibrium refinement provides how of choosing one or many equilibria from among several in a very game. several games might contain many Nash equilibria, and therefore supply

Difference monopolistic competition and perfect competition, What is the di...

What is the different monopolistic competition and perfect competition? Monopolistic Competition versus Perfect Competition Into the long-run equilibrium of a monopolistical

Hicks, Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of...

Winner of the Nobel Prize in 1972, Hicks is acknowledged mutually of the leading economists normally equilibrium theory. he's credited with the introduction of the notion of elasti

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd