coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Game playing in class:adding numbers—win at 100, GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME...

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME 1 Adding Numbers—Win at 100 This game is described in Exercise 3.7a. In this version, two players take turns choosing a number between 1 and 10 (inclus

Pareto dominated, An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outco...

An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outcome would build a minimum of one player at an advantage while not hurting the other player. That is, another outcome is weak

Nash equilibrium, Assuming that there are only 2 airline companies in the w...

Assuming that there are only 2 airline companies in the world, Delta and US Airways, what is the ((Nash) Equilibrium) or price that each company in the following matrix will charge

Games with sequential moves:rollback equilibrium, Rollback shows that Boein...

Rollback shows that Boeing chooses peace over war if Airbus enters, so Airbus will enter. Rollback equilibrium entails Airbus playing “Enter” and Boeing playing “Peace if entry”; e

Normal kind, The normal kind may be a matrix illustration of a simultaneous...

The normal kind may be a matrix illustration of a simultaneous game. For 2 players, one is that the "row" player, and also the different, the "column" player. Every rows or column

Solve for the bayesian nash equilibrium, Consider the Cournot duopoly model...

Consider the Cournot duopoly model in which two rms, 1 and 2, simultaneously choose the quantities they will sell in the market, q 1 and q 2 . The price each receives for each uni

Formal rules for identification, Identification may be established either ...

Identification may be established either by the examination of the specification of the structural model, or by the examination of the reduced form of the model. Traditionally

Free rider / free riding , The notion that those that don't contribute to s...

The notion that those that don't contribute to some project might nevertheless get pleasure from it (free riders), evidenced in games like the tragedy of the commons and public pro

Imperfect data, A sequential game is one among imperfect data if a player d...

A sequential game is one among imperfect data if a player doesn't grasp precisely what actions different players took up to that time. Technically, there exists a minimum of one da

Dominated strategy , A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other p...

A strategy is dominated if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a smaller payoff than another strategy. Hence, a method is dominated if it's invariably

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd