coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Symmetric game, Scenario Any game during which the identity of the playe...

Scenario Any game during which the identity of the player doesn't amendment the ensuing game facing that player is symmetric. In different words, every player earns identical pa

Stag hunt , Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presente...

Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presented the subsequent state of affairs. 2 hunters will either jointly hunt a stag (an adult deer and rather massive meal)

Application to business strategy, Game Theory has evolved since its start a...

Game Theory has evolved since its start as a thought exercise for academic mathematicians. Taught in economics departments , top business schools, and the strategic analysis, even

What do meant by monopolistic competition, What do meant by Monopolistic co...

What do meant by Monopolistic competition? Monopolistic competition is a market structure wherein: 1. There are several competing producers into an industry, 2. Every pro

Best reply dynamic, The best reply dynamic is usally termed the Cournot adj...

The best reply dynamic is usally termed the Cournot adjustment model or Cournot learning after Augustin Cournot who first proposed it in the context of a duopoly model. Each of two

Application of twenty one card game, This version of Twenty-one is a card g...

This version of Twenty-one is a card game played between a player and the dealer (the computer). The aim of the game is to accumulate a higher point total than the dealer but witho

Bayesian game and find its bayesian equilibria, Two people are involved in ...

Two people are involved in a dispute. Person 1 does not know whether person 2 is strong or weak; she assigns probability to person 2 being strong. Person 2 is fully informed. Each

Trigger strategy, A strategy sometimes applied to repeated prisoner's dilem...

A strategy sometimes applied to repeated prisoner's dilemmas during which a player begins by cooperating however defects to cheating for a predefined amount of your time as a respo

Extensive games with sumultaneous moves, consider the three player game in ...

consider the three player game in question 2 in assignment 1. Assume now that player 3 moves first. Players 1 and 2

Bidding increment, A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the ...

A bidding increment is defined by the auctioneer as the least amount above the previous bid that a new bid must be in order to be adequate to the auctioneer. For example, if the in

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd