coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Paradox of identification, Discussion in the preceding section suggests tha...

Discussion in the preceding section suggests that if we want to measure a given hnction belonging to a simultaneous-equations model, the hnction must be fairly stable over the samp

Equilibrium payoffs, Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes...

Equilibrium payoffs a) The reward system changes payoffs for Player A, but does not change the equilibrium strategies in the game. Player A still takes the money at the fir

Utility, In any game, utility represents the motivations of players. A util...

In any game, utility represents the motivations of players. A utility perform for a given player assigns variety for each potential outcome of the sport with the property that a be

Nash equilibrium - pay off, The following is a payoff matrix for a non-coop...

The following is a payoff matrix for a non-cooperative simultaneous move game between 2 players. The payoffs are in the order (Player 1; Player 2): What is the Nash Equilibri

Compute the nash equilibrium, Consider two quantity-setting firms that prod...

Consider two quantity-setting firms that produce a homogeneous good. The inverse demand function for the good is p = A - (q 1 +q 2 ). Both firms have a cost function C = q 2 (a

Weakly dominant strategy , A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what...

A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a payoff a minimum of as high as the other strategy, and, the strategy earns a st

Game theory equilibrium exercise, Exercise 1 a) Pure strategy nash equi...

Exercise 1 a) Pure strategy nash equilibrium in this case is Not Buy, bad ( 0,0) as no one wants to deviate from this strategy. b) The player chooses buy in the first perio

Swertres computation, please compute this number 885 for the swertres lotto...

please compute this number 885 for the swertres lotto game.

Auctions, what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction compris...

what will be the best strategy for a bidder in an auction comprised of four bidders?

nim game, Matches or different objects are organized in 2 or a lot of pile...

Matches or different objects are organized in 2 or a lot of piles. Players alternate removing some or all of the matches from anyone pile. The player to get rid of the last match w

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd