coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Mutual information, Something in a very game is Mutual information if all p...

Something in a very game is Mutual information if all players realize it. A seemingly straightforward concept, mutual information is insufficient to research most games, since it's

nim game, Matches or different objects are organized in 2 or a lot of pile...

Matches or different objects are organized in 2 or a lot of piles. Players alternate removing some or all of the matches from anyone pile. The player to get rid of the last match w

Incentive, A payoff offerd as a bequest for someone partaking in some activ...

A payoff offerd as a bequest for someone partaking in some activity that doesn't directly provide her with profit. Often, such incentives are given to beat the ethical hazard drawb

Animal puzzle, a) This you just have to list all the attributes for the pro...

a) This you just have to list all the attributes for the program. i.e. unique id's for puzzle pieces, attributes for the puzzle like a data field for the number of edges, methods t

Dominant strategy , Normal 0 false false false EN-US ...

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Personal theory of international trade, I have an assignment in which I hav...

I have an assignment in which I have to invent a new international trade theory. For me, the absolute advantage of Adam Smith is really good, and I want to find a solution if a cou

Pareto dominated, An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outco...

An outcome of a game is Pareto dominated if another outcome would build a minimum of one player at an advantage while not hurting the other player. That is, another outcome is weak

Bayes rule, Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the follo...

Treating probability as a logic, Thomas Bayes defined the following: Pr(X|Y)=Pr(Y|X)Pr(X)/Pr(Y) For example, probability that the weather was bad given that our friends playe

Sealed bid auction, An auction during which bidders simultaneously submit b...

An auction during which bidders simultaneously submit bids to the auctioneer while not information of the number bid by different participants. Usually, the very best bidder (or lo

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd