coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Leadership in an oil production game, Leadership in an Oil Production Game ...

Leadership in an Oil Production Game Students can be broken into pairs to play this game once, witheach student's representing one country; then each shouldswitch partners and

Ordinal payoffs, Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a...

Ordinal payoffs are numbers representing the outcomes of a game where the worth of the numbers isn't vital, however solely the ordering of numbers. for instance, when solving for a

Perfect data, A sequential game is one among one in all if just one player ...

A sequential game is one among one in all if just one player moves at a time and if every player is aware of each action of the players that moved before him at every purpose. Tech

Simultaneous move games with mixed strategies, This chapter introduces mixe...

This chapter introduces mixed strategies and the methods used to solve for mixed strategy equilibria. Students are likely to accept the idea of randomization more readily if they t

Schedule bid , A bid that indicates totally different costs for various qua...

A bid that indicates totally different costs for various quantitites of the item offered for sale. A series of price-quantity mixtures is tendered to the auctioneer.

Fighting for survival, Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is wo...

Two animals are fighting over a prey. The prey is worth v to each animal. The cost of fighting is c1 for the first animal (player 1) and c2 for the second animal (player 2). If the

Bidding ring, A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bi...

A set of colluding bidders. Ring participants agree to rig bids by agreeing not to bid against each other, either by avoiding the auction or by placing phony (phantom) bids.

Application to strategic management, Game Theory has evolved since its orig...

Game Theory has evolved since its origins as an idea exercise for educational mathematicians. Taught in prime business faculties, economics departments, and even military academies

All pure nash equilibrium for strategic form game, write a program in c tha...

write a program in c that takes n number finite players using gambit format and output is to be all pure strategy nash equilibrium

Pure coordination game, Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously ...

Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously elect a technology to use for his or her compatible merchandise. If the corporations adopt totally different standards, few sales

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd