coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Tower defense game, Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy gam...

Tower defense - is a subgenre of real-time strategy games. The goal of tower defense games is to try to stop enemies from crossing a map by building towers which shoot at them as t

Best reply dynamic, The best reply dynamic is usally termed the Cournot adj...

The best reply dynamic is usally termed the Cournot adjustment model or Cournot learning after Augustin Cournot who first proposed it in the context of a duopoly model. Each of two

Imperfect data, A sequential game is one among imperfect data if a player d...

A sequential game is one among imperfect data if a player doesn't grasp precisely what actions different players took up to that time. Technically, there exists a minimum of one da

Totally mixed strategy, A mixed strategy during which the player assigns st...

A mixed strategy during which the player assigns strictly positive chance to each pure strategy.Morgenstern, Oskar,Coauthor of Theory of Games and Economic Behavior with John von N

Multiple item auction, Normal 0 false false false EN-US...

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE

Hawk-dove game , Scenario The hawk-dove game is additionally commonly ca...

Scenario The hawk-dove game is additionally commonly called the sport of chicken. 2 hooligans with one thing to prove drive at one another on a slender road. The primary to swer

Weakly dominant strategy , A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what...

A strategy is weakly dominant if, no matter what the other players do, the strategy earns a player a payoff a minimum of as high as the other strategy, and, the strategy earns a st

Case study in game theory - color coordination, Game 1 Color Coordination (...

Game 1 Color Coordination (with Delay) This game should be played twice, once without the delay tactic and once with it, to show the difference between out- comes in the s

Rollback , Rollback (often referred to as backward induction) is an iterati...

Rollback (often referred to as backward induction) is an iterative method for solving finite in depth kind or sequential games. First, one determines the optimal strategy of the pl

Full equilibrium strategy example, (a) A player wins if she takes the tota...

(a) A player wins if she takes the total to 100 and additions of any value from 1 through 10 are allowed. Thus, if you take the sum to 89, you are guaran- teed to win; your oppone

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd