coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Extraneous estimates, Extraneous Estimates If some parameters are identi...

Extraneous Estimates If some parameters are identified, while others are not and there exists information on their value from other (extraneous) sources, the researcher may pro

All pure nash equilibrium for strategic form game, write a program in c tha...

write a program in c that takes n number finite players using gambit format and output is to be all pure strategy nash equilibrium

sub game excellent nash equilibrium , A sub game excellent Nash equilibriu...

A sub game excellent Nash equilibrium is an equilibrium such that players' methods represent a Nash equilibrium in each sub game of the initial game. it should be found by backward

Pure coordination game, Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously ...

Scenario Two corporations should simultaneously elect a technology to use for his or her compatible merchandise. If the corporations adopt totally different standards, few sales

Find all nash equilibria of game- game theory, Game Theory: (prisoner'...

Game Theory: (prisoner's dilemma) Consider the following 2 x 2 pricing game, where rms choose whether to price High or Low simultaneously. Find the equilibrium in dominant s

Tit for tat, A type of trigger strategy sometimes applied to the repeated P...

A type of trigger strategy sometimes applied to the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma during which a player responds in one amount with identical action her opponent utilized in the last

Multiunit auction, An auction during which many (more than one) things are ...

An auction during which many (more than one) things are offered for sale. Mechanisms for allocating multiple units embody discriminatory and uniform worth auctions.

Formulate the situation as strategic game - nash equilibrium, Two individua...

Two individuals use a common resource (a river or a forest, for example) to produce output. The more the resource is used, the less output any given individual can produce. Denote

Find pure nash equilibria, Find Pure Nash Equilibria 1. Consider a two-...

Find Pure Nash Equilibria 1. Consider a two-player game in which player 1 chooses the strategy x 1 from the closed interval [-1, 1] while player 2 chooses the strategy x 2 fr

Blind auction, Another term for a preserved bid auction in which bidders si...

Another term for a preserved bid auction in which bidders simultaneously submit bids to the auctioneer with no knowledge of the amount bid by other member. Usually, the uppermost b

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd