coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Game playing in class:adding numbers—win at 100, GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME...

GAME PLAYING IN CLASS GAME 1 Adding Numbers—Win at 100 This game is described in Exercise 3.7a. In this version, two players take turns choosing a number between 1 and 10 (inclus

Explain about the term game theory, Explain about the term Game Theory. ...

Explain about the term Game Theory. Game Theory: While the decisions of two or more firms considerably influence each others’ profits, in that case they are into a situation

Schedule bid , A bid that indicates totally different costs for various qua...

A bid that indicates totally different costs for various quantitites of the item offered for sale. A series of price-quantity mixtures is tendered to the auctioneer.

Games sequential moves-game played b/w pitcher and batter, Problem: Consid...

Problem: Consider a (simplified) game played between a pitcher (who chooses between throwing a fastball or a curve) and a batter (who chooses which pitch to expect). The batter ha

Heuristic, A heuristic is an aid to learning, casually brought up as a rule...

A heuristic is an aid to learning, casually brought up as a rule of thumb. Formally, a heuristic may be a mechanism capable of altering its internal model of the surroundings in re

Finding Equilibrium in Game Theory, This is Case of Competitive Games. ...

This is Case of Competitive Games. Player 2 L R Player 1 L (60,40) (70,30) R (65,35) (60,40) Are either have dominant st

Status of identification, In econometric theory two possibie situations of ...

In econometric theory two possibie situations of identifiability can arise: Equation under,consideration is identified or not identified: 1) Equation is under-identified-

NAsh equilibrium, Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 ...

Consider a game in which player 1 chooses rows, player 2 chooses columns and player 3 chooses matrices. Only Player 3''s payoffs are given below. Show that D is not a best response

Two player problem of points set up - game theory, a) Show that A c...

a) Show that A counting proof could be fun(?). But any old proof will do. (Note that the coefficients (1,2,1) in the above are just the elements of the second row of Pas

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd