coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Combination of sequential and simultanous game, To give Mom a day of rest,...

To give Mom a day of rest, Dad Plans to take his two children, Bart and Cassie, on an outing on Sunday.Bart prefers to go to the amusement park (A), Whereas Cassie prefers to go to

Strategies against hostage takers, Strategies against Hostage Takers T...

Strategies against Hostage Takers T ypical Situations Terrorists: usually have several hostages, demands are polit- ical, may be fanatics, location may be public or sec

Game playing in class-equilibrium payoffs are (4, Equilibrium payoffs are (...

Equilibrium payoffs are (4, 5). Player A’s equilibrium strategy is “S then S if n and then N if n again.” Player B’s equilibrium strategy is “n if S and then n if S again and then

Experimental economics , Experimental economics is bothered with utilizing ...

Experimental economics is bothered with utilizing laboratory experiments to realize understanding of how cognition, memory, and heuristics have an effect on behavior of individuals

Pure strategy, A pure strategy defines a selected move or action that a pla...

A pure strategy defines a selected move or action that a player can follow in each potential attainable state of affairs in a very game. Such moves might not be random, or drawn fr

Game 5 all-pay acution of $10, GAME 5 All-Pay Acution of $10 Everyone ...

GAME 5 All-Pay Acution of $10 Everyone plays. Show the students a $10 bill, and announce that it is the prize; the known value of the prize guarantees that there is no winer’s

Determine nash equilibria, Consider the electoral competition game presente...

Consider the electoral competition game presented in Lecture 6. In this game there are two candidates who simultaneously choose policies from the real line. There is a distribution

Game of chicken, Scenario Two hooligans with one thing to prove drive at...

Scenario Two hooligans with one thing to prove drive at one another on a slender road. the primary to swerve loses faces among his peers. If neither swerves, however, a terminal

Discriminatory auction, A multiunit auction that during which within which ...

A multiunit auction that during which within which  each winning bidder pays a unique worth which depends on the particular bid placed by every winning participant. Alternatively,

Cournot and Stackelberg., Consider two identical firms, for each firm, the ...

Consider two identical firms, for each firm, the total cost of producing q units of output is C(q)=0.5q^2. The price is determined as P(q1,q2)- a-q1-q2. Estimate Cournots outcome;

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd