coalitional game and matching markets, Game Theory

Assignment Help:
1. This question and the next is based on the following description.
Consider the coalitional game (referred to as Game 1) given by: N = {1,2,3,4};
v(N) = 3, v{i} = 0, i = 1,...,4, v{j,4} = 0, j = 1,2,3,
v(S) = 1 for all other coalitions S.
In Game 1,
a) players 1, 3 and 4 are substitutes.
b) players 2 is a dummy player.
c) players 1, 2 and 3 are substitutes.
d) player 4 is a dummy player.
e) None of the above.
2. In Game 1, player 1’s Shapley value is
a) 5/6.
b) 11/12.
c) 1/6.
d) 1/4.
e) None of the above.
3. In Game 1, player 4’s Shapley value is
a) 1/4.
b) 1/2.
c) 1/6.
d) 5/6.
e) None of the above.
4. Consider the two-sided matching model in which a set of three men M = {m1,m2,m3} and a set of three women W = {w1,w2,w3} have strict preferences over members of the opposite sex, given by
m1 : w2,w1,w3; w1 : m1,m3,m2
m2 : w1,w2,w3; w2 : m3,m1,m2
m3 : w1,w2,w3; w3 : m1,m2,m3.
The men ?nd all the women acceptable and the women ?nd all the men acceptable.
a) The men-proposing (M-proposing) and the women-proposing (W-proposing) Deferred Ac-ceptance Algorithms (DAAs) lead to the same core-stable matching for this example.
b) The M-proposing DAA matches m2 with w2 while the the W-proposing DAA matches m2 with w3.
c) Each of m1 and m2 strictly prefers his M-proposing match to his W-proposing match.
d) Each of w1, w2 and w3 strictly prefers her W-proposing match to her M-proposing match.
e) None of the above.
5. Consider the problem of matching a set of four students {i1,i2,i3,i4} to a set of three schools {s1,s2,s3}, where school s1 has a quota (or capacity) of 2 students each and schools s2 and s3 have a quota of 1 student each. Each student has a strict preference ranking over the schools and each school has a priority order for the students that is determined by a central authority. Each student’s preference and each school’s (strict) priority order for each student are given below
i1 : s3, s1, s2 s1 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i2 : s2, s1, s3 s2 : i1, i2, i3, i4
i3 : s1, s3, s2 s3 : i3, i1, i2, i4
i4 : s1, s2, s3
Applying the Top Trading Cycle Algorithm (TTCA) to this school choice problem leads to
a) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i3 to s4.
b) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s1.
c) i2 matched to s3, i3 to s2 and i4 to s1.
d) i1 matched to s3, i2 to s1 and i4 to s2.
e) None of the above.

Related Discussions:- coalitional game and matching markets

Proxy bidder , A proxy bidder represents the interests of a bidder not phys...

A proxy bidder represents the interests of a bidder not physically gift at the auction. Typically, the bidder can inform his proxy of the most quantity he's willing to pay, and als

Find the pure-strategy nash equilibrium, Find the pure-strategy Nash equili...

Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium Alice is on vacation in Wonderland and considers trying a special mushroom sold by the caterpillar. She cannot tell upfront if the mush

All-pay auction, A type of auction in which the highest bidder is rewarded ...

A type of auction in which the highest bidder is rewarded the object, but all bidders pay the auctioneer their bids. This differs from traditional first price auctions in which onl

Games with strategic moves, Games with Strat e gic M ov es   ...

Games with Strat e gic M ov es   The ideas in this chapters can be brought to life and the students can better appreciate the subtleties of various strategic moves an

Find the quantities that firm is selling – equilibrium price, 1. Two firms,...

1. Two firms, producing an identical good, engage in price competition. The cost functions are c 1 (y 1 ) = 1:17y 1 and c 2 (y 2 ) = 1:19y 2 , correspondingly. The demand functi

Compute the nash equilibrium, Consider two quantity-setting firms that prod...

Consider two quantity-setting firms that produce a homogeneous good. The inverse demand function for the good is p = A - (q 1 +q 2 ). Both firms have a cost function C = q 2 (a

Stag hunt , Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presente...

Scenario The French thinker, Jean Jacques Rousseau, presented the subsequent state of affairs. 2 hunters will either jointly hunt a stag (an adult deer and rather massive meal)

Tit for tat, A type of trigger strategy sometimes applied to the repeated P...

A type of trigger strategy sometimes applied to the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma during which a player responds in one amount with identical action her opponent utilized in the last

Free rider / free riding , The notion that those that don't contribute to s...

The notion that those that don't contribute to some project might nevertheless get pleasure from it (free riders), evidenced in games like the tragedy of the commons and public pro

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd