User Account

All Pages

case, Business Law and Ethics

Assignment Help:
Corgi was the breeder of prize-winning pedigree dogs that often sold for very high prices. Reynolds, a wealthy businessman who had recently retired, decided to purchase one of these dogs. His intention was to enter the animal in the various dog shows that were held from time to time across the country.

Reynolds knew very little about dogs. He explained to Corgi that he wished to purchase a young dog that was already a prize-winning specimen of the breed. Corgi took Reynolds to a fenced run where several young dogs were caged. He pointed to one dog that he said, in his opinion, had the greatest potential, and that it had already won a prize at a local dog show. Corgi pointed to a red ribbon pinned to the opposite wall of the kennel building and explained that it was a first-prize ribbon that the dog had won. Reynolds did not bother to examine the ribbon.

Reynolds purchased the dog for $1,000 and took it home. His neighbour later saw the dog in Reynolds'' backyard. He instantly recognized it as the dog that had recently won the first-prize ribbon in the children''s pet show at the neighbourhood park. When he told Reynolds where he had last seen the dog, Reynolds telephoned Corgi immediately and demanded his money back.

Corgi refused to return Reynolds'' money or take back the dog, and Reynolds threatened to take legal proceedings against him. Reynolds was unable to do so immediately, however, as he was called out of town on a family matter the next day. He was obliged to leave the dog with his neighbour during his absence. Reynolds advised the neighbour to take care of the animal as if it were his own.

Reynolds was out of town for several weeks. During that time, his neighbour entered the dog in a dog show sponsored by a kennel club. The dog won first prize in its class for its breed. On Reynolds'' return, the neighbour advised him of his success. The two men decided to enter the dog in another dog show that was scheduled to be held in a nearby city.

At this second show, the dog placed only third in its class, and Reynolds was disappointed. He returned home and immediately took legal action against Corgi.

Discuss the basis of Reynolds'' claim and the defences (if any) of Corgi. Render, with reasons, a decision.

Related Discussions:- case

Service excellence in business, Mr Zamora was apparently worried.  Not ever...

Mr Zamora was apparently worried.  Not everything was going his way.  It was already 6.00 p.m. and his car had broken down.  He had to travel to the Mexico City airport to leave fo

Faith irrational , Jake grew up in a passionately devoted religious communi...

Jake grew up in a passionately devoted religious community.  He has been taught from a young age that an invisible, all-powerful God loves him.  He was also taught that he will be

Case study, I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

I don''t know how to make a maxim. And my case is

Discuss about the three streams, Discuss about the three streams There...

Discuss about the three streams There come times, however, when these three streams are joined. An event in the political stream, such as a change in administration, calls for

Role and Functions of Law, Discuss the roles of law and courts in today''s ...

Discuss the roles of law and courts in today''s business environment. •Compare and contrast the federal court structure with your Florida''s court structure. •Discuss the concept

Authority of precedent - statement of salmond, Authority of Precedent - Sta...

Authority of Precedent - Statement of Salmond There writing on the authority of the precedent Salmond has stated as follows like; "The importance of judicial precedent has

Duties of auditors, DUTIES OF AUDITORS: The duties of auditors are exp...

DUTIES OF AUDITORS: The duties of auditors are explained in the following cases. 1. RE: KINGSTON COTTON MILL CO. (1896)(CHANCERY) For some years before a company was wou

Ethics, Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mar...

Assignments should be submitted on or before the due date. Zero mark will follow late submission of an assignment unless you have an acceptable reason approved by the instructor.

Resolution to wind up voluntarily, Resolution to Wind Up Voluntarily: ...

Resolution to Wind Up Voluntarily:  The type of resolution to be passed varies with the circumstances of the case, as provided in s.271(1): (a) If the articles provide for

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions, Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: ...

Scheme at meeting - reconstructions: Following approval of the scheme at meeting(s) application is made to the court for an order to approve and implement the scheme.  At this

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Order Assignment

Featured Services

Order Now

Popular Subjects

Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

whatsapp: +91-977-207-8620

Phone: +91-977-207-8620

Email: [email protected]

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd