Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages, Theory of Computation

Assignment Help:

Theorem The class of recognizable languages is closed under Boolean operations.

The construction of the proof of Lemma 3 gives us a DFA that keeps track of whether or not a given string is in either or both of any pair of recognizable languages. We can modify the construction for other Boolean operations simply by selecting the appropriate set of accepting states:

• Union: Let F′

= {(q, p) | q ∈ F1 or p ∈ F2}. Then L(A′ ) = L1 ∪ L2.

• Relative complement: Let F′ = F1 × (Q2 - F2). Then L(A′ ) = L1 -L2.

• Complement: Let L1 = Σ* and use the construction for relative complement.


Related Discussions:- Boolean operations - class of recognizable languages

Closure properties of recognizable languages, We got the class LT by taking...

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also

Moore machine, Construct a Moore machine to convert a binary string of radi...

Construct a Moore machine to convert a binary string of radix 4.

Mapping reducibility, (c) Can you say that B is decidable? (d) If you someh...

(c) Can you say that B is decidable? (d) If you somehow know that A is decidable, what can you say about B?

Qbasic, Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Ask question #Minimum 100 words accepte

Automata, automata of atm machine

automata of atm machine

Decidability, examples of decidable problems

examples of decidable problems

Strictly k-local automata, Strictly 2-local automata are based on lookup ta...

Strictly 2-local automata are based on lookup tables that are sets of 2-factors, the pairs of adjacent symbols which are permitted to occur in a word. To generalize, we extend the

Class of local languages is not closed under union, Both L 1 and L 2 are ...

Both L 1 and L 2 are SL 2 . (You should verify this by thinking about what the automata look like.) We claim that L 1 ∪ L 2 ∈ SL 2 . To see this, suppose, by way of con

Third model of computation, Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xe...

Computer has a single LIFO stack containing ?xed precision unsigned integers (so each integer is subject to over?ow problems) but which has unbounded depth (so the stack itself nev

Write Your Message!

Captcha
Free Assignment Quote

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd