What your character have done instead to improve performance

Assignment Help Business Management

Reference no: EM133915995

Discussion Post: Teamwork

Read the scenario and put yourself in the shoes of one of the below characters according to the following rules. Think about how they approached working on this team and reacted to each situation. Get the instant assignment help.

Answer the following questions in a reply to this discussion (keep it relatively brief - less than a paragraph per question):

I. What are some of things that your character did (or did not do) that led to the poor performance of the team?
II. What could your character have done instead to improve the team performance in this scenario?

Scenario

Sheik, Bola, and Randi are on a team project for an ASU Online engineering course. Sheik is a bit nervous as this is their first online class, so they send out a friendly introduction email to the team 5 days before the first deliverable due date. Randi responds immediately, assigning each team member parts to complete and tells Sheik to compile and submit the final document. Sheik notices they do not hear from Bola all week. Finally, minutes before the deadline as Sheik is waiting at their computer, Bola sends her completed components along with a short apology. Sheik is frustrated but submits the assignment at the deadline.

Later, the team schedules a team meeting on Zoom for the second deliverable. While Sheik and Randi arrive on time, Bola shows up 15 minutes late. To start, the team reads through the assignment instructions and talks about what to do for the remainder of the meeting. They decide to begin brainstorming design ideas; Sheik and Bola start talking about their solutions but Randi cuts them off, stating their ideas definitely are not feasible. Randi tells them they should use his idea because it makes the most sense and he has the most experience in this field. Sheik begins to object but Randi already starts typing up his idea in the shared document so they decide to move forward with Randi's idea. Later, they individually work on their deliverable components and again Bola sends her part to Sheik later than agreed upon.

After the second deliverable is submitted, the students are asked to provide feedback to each other. Sheik gives great reviews even though they have some concerns, hoping that the team performance will improve. Randi gives mixed reviews to both teammates stating that they need to improve their work and have better ideas. Bola gives good reviews to Randi because she is worried that he will get mad at her if she gives constructive feedback.

Over the next several weeks, they work individually on a shared document for the final deliverable but do not update each other on their progress. As the weeks go by, the frustration within the team grows. Sheik and Bola get more discouraged as Randi leaves comments on their work stating it is not good enough and that they need to follow Randi's instructions. Sheik and Randi can't understand why Bola's contributions are consistently delayed and lacking in quality. Sheik looks at Bola's contributions and finds they are missing some requirements of the project; Sheik decides to fix Bola's work on the document rather than bring it up with her directly.

The lack of collaboration is taking its toll. Without regular updates, the team's work starts to feel disjointed and disconnected. They submit their assignment but all three of them are disappointed in the final product. The project falls short of their initial expectations and when they receive their final grade, it is not as good as they hoped.

When it's time for the final peer evaluations sent to the professor, Bola shares she has been working overtime to support her family. She did not fully understand the needs of the project and knew she needed help but was afraid to seek it out from the professor or her teammates. Randi shares his frustration with the team aspect of the project, stating it would be much better if he could do it on his own. Sheik writes that they have regrets on how the project played out and thinks it may be their fault that things did not go well.

Reference no: EM133915995

Questions Cloud

Associated with sexually transmitted infections : A nurse is planning a health class program for students in high school. What risk factors associated with sexually transmitted infections

Provide a brief summary of the literature : Provide a brief summary of the literature. Identify the primary components of this plan from 1972 and discuss their value today.

Development of a microgravity simulation platform : ENG80002 Engineering Master Major Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology - Development of a Microgravity Simulation Platform Using Light Jet Aircraft

What are differential diagnoses and rationales : A 75-year-old man presented to your office accompanied by his spouse. What are differential diagnoses? Rationales. What level of care is appropriate for patient

What your character have done instead to improve performance : What are some of thing that your character did that led to poor performance of team? What could your character have done instead to improve the team performance

View to modifying inappropriate practices or approaches : What actions or behaviours should you evaluate in terms of frameworks and non-compliance, with a view to modifying inappropriate practices or approaches?

Significant for lupus erythematosus and hypertension : A 38 year old female with a past medical history of significant for lupus erythematosus (SLE) and hypertension, presents to her Primary Care Physician

Felicity is support worker who has recently started work : Felicity is a support worker who has recently started work at an organisation that provides respite care for people who have a disability.

What techniques will you use to identify and analyze risks : What's your risk management approach and strategy for this effort? What techniques will you use to identify and analyze risks?

User Account

All Pages