Reference no: EM133864428

Problem

Which foreseeability factors are most critical to this situation? Why? Intended Use vs. Misuse: The stove is intended for cooking, not as a heating substitute or footrest. However, manufacturers must consider common alternative uses. Product Stability, Design, and Warnings: The stove should be stable enough to withstand reasonable pressure or weight, even if the oven door is open. If it was designed to be prone to tipping, Packer Stove Company should have considered design reinforcements or warning labels. Consumer Misuse Risks: It is foreseeable that some consumers might use the stove for warmth, especially in homes without heat. Where does Mr. Smith's injury lie on the foreseeability spectrum? Mr. Smith's injury likely lies in the middle range because: While using an oven for warmth is not its intended purpose, it is not unheard of, especially in colder climates. Also, if the stove lacks design features to prevent tipping with an open door, the tipping risk could have been a foreseeable safety risk. Get the instant assignment help. What is the objective standard? How does it apply in this case? The objective standard compares how a "reasonable person" would act in similar circumstances.