Reference no: EM133190841 , Length: word count:750
Quesiton 1:
What are two ways administrative law impacts your life?
Instructions
In 600 - 750 words discuss:
The doctrines of federalism and separation of powers prohibit the federal government from interfering with states where there is no direct connection to a constitutionally delegated federal power. As a result, attempts at federal gun control were found unconstitutional in the cases of United States v. Lopez and Printz v. United States. Assuming that the court's interpretation of the law was accurate, do you believe that the states' power to regulate in these matters should outweigh the federal government's right to do so? What, if anything, should be done?
Use a minimum of 2 scholarly references.
Quesiton 2:
In 600 - 750 words discuss:
Each state has its own rulemaking requirements, and state rulemaking requirements often differ significantly from the federal formal versus informal model. Discuss whether you think your state should follow the federal pattern for rulemaking.
Use a minimum of 2 scholarly references.
APA FORMAT OF WRITING
Quesiton 3:
Instructions
Prepare a PowerPoint (minimum 5 slides total, EXcluding a title and reference slide) discussing the following:
To what extent should business entities, such as corporations, be entitled to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination? Explain your position.
Quesiton 4:
Instructions
Prepare a PowerPoint (minimum of 5 slides total, EXcluding a title and reference slide) discussing the following:
In Gonzales v. Reno the court chose to uphold the INS right to make a policy decision in the absence of Congressional direction. They did make known that they "are not untroubled by the degree of obedience that the INS appears to give to the wishes of parents, especially parents who are outside of this country's jurisdiction." The court also showed concern with the INS policy of not considering the communist-totalitarian state to itself justify the consideration of Elian's asylum petition. Ultimately, however, the court found the INS decision not to be unreasonable. Do you believe it is possible for an administrative agency to be able to make fair and constitutionally defendable alternative decisions based on varying fact situations on a case-by-case basis, or must a single, fairly rigid policy be utilized?
APA format of writing