Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Question: Securities Laws. In 1997, WTS Transnational, Inc., required financing to develop a prototype of an unpatented finger print verification system. At the time, WTS had no revenue, $655,000 in liabilities, and only $10,000 in assets. Thomas Cavanagh and Frank Nicolois, who operated an investment banking company called U.S. Milestone (USM), arranged the financing using Curbstone Acquisition Corp. Curbstone had no assets but had registered approximately 3.5 million shares of stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under the terms of the deal, Curbstone acquired WTS, and the resulting entity was named Electro-Optical Systems Corp. (EOSC). New EOSC shares were issued to all of the WTS shareholders. Only Cavanagh and others affiliated with USM could sell EOSC stock to the public, however. Over the next few months, these individuals issued false press releases, made small deceptive purchases of EOSC shares at high prices, distributed hundreds of thousands of shares to friends and relatives, and sold their own shares at inflated prices through third party companies they owned. When the SEC began to investigate, the share price fell to its actual value, and innocent investors lost over $15 million. Were any securities laws violated in this case? If so, what might be an appropriate remedy?
Howard and Hannah decide to resolve a contract dispute through arbitration.
Which charge would have priority, Fred's or A Bank's? If Fred's floating charge was not registered, which charge would have priority
Essay question: How Business ethics make you money and how it makes you no money? What are the good ethics and what are the bad ethics?
Explain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan while considering stakeholder needs and agendas
In 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner declared the "Fleeing Felon Doctrine" unconstitutional. Would you agree with this? In a minimum 200 word response, why would this doctrine be declared unconstitutional and why
Chart the law against the facts ?Once you have done substantial research, create a chart that lists each essential fact or event and identify the main legal element that pertains to the event. Identify the issues ?Using the chart of law and facts..
Crime control policy goes back to the founding principles laid out in the Constitution and the debate over federal versus state rights.
On MGI's behalf, you sign a note for the loan and offer its accounts receivable as collateral. You sign a security agreement that describes the collateral. The bank does not file a financing statement. Has the banks security interest attached
the development of policing in america was greatly influenced by the developments of the london metropolitan police
You will identify ten job search websites useful for criminal justice students. Using the "Table" function in Microsoft Word, create a chart with following information. First Column Heading - Name of Website
Explain the degree to which media portrayal of crime relates to public fear of crime and explain how. Explain whether public fear of crime might influence individual behavior or not and explain how or how not
1. Over the first nine weeks of the course, reflecting on what you have written in your journal about what were the really interesting things we have covered together and why? 2. What was less interesting or perhaps not likely to be of much use to ..
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd