Reference no: EM132185199

CASE 1

This case said that the defendant ran a self-service shop in which non-doctor prescribed medications and prescriptions, a significant number of which were recorded in the Poisons List gave in the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933, were sold. These things were shown in open racks from which they could be chosen by the client, set in a shopping bushel, and taken to the till where they would be paid for. The till was worked by an enlisted drug specialist.

CASE 2

There is another case that similar to the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co which is Fisher v Bell 1961. This case state about the defendant was arraigned with the offering for sale of a flick cut reverse S.1(1) of the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. the defendant was arraigned with the offering for sale of a flick cut reverse S.1(1) of the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. The respondent was charged because the exhibited of knife that construct for sale. At that point, the court held than consonance with the normal meaning of agreement law, the knife that show isn't considered as an offer, however that is an absolutely an invitation to treat, and the defendant had not offered the knife for sale according to the significance of the Act of S1(1). Although the flick cut is as one with a sticker price and a ticket that had expressed "Ejector-cut 4s". Be that as it may, in the legitimate term, the circumstance in the window rack was an offer for the client to purchase the flick cut. It is all around settled in contract law that the show of a thing in a shop window considered as an encouragement to treat because the client hasn't got it and it will end up the offer after the client paid the thing. Toward the end, the defendant had been accused of the reason of not liable of the offence.