Reference no: EM132227196

Section A: Literature Support

To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the Problem Description Assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists" available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.

Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template" available in the textbook appendix or use the "Evaluation Table Template" resource as an adaptable template.

Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the project's problem and proposed solution. Make sure to include:

1. Description of the search method (i.e., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).

2. Summarization of all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.

3. Description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.

Section B: Literature Support

Literature Support Summarize the research support for the project's problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional journals.

Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) the search method data without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or is outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work ignores or superficially evaluates the research strengths, and limitations, and draws unwarranted conclusions. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Work provides a basic overview of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution, and minimally includes any rationale, details and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research. Work lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work conducts a surface level of evaluation of the research strengths and limitations. Very narrow conclusions are provided. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Work provides a complete summary of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution in a concise manner, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research providing some detailed rationale, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work analyzes the research strengths and limitations and provides direct, competent, and appropriate conclusions. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of the subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Work provides a detailed summary of the individual research support for the project's problem and proposed solution emphasizing the essential components, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research in-depth, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the research strengths and limitations, drawing warranted conclusions. The research support is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Objectives:

These are the topic 2 assignment

1. Analyze current practice versus research to recognize a change.

2. Assess stakeholders, team roles, and leadership skills needed to bring about change.

3. Create evidence-based practice objectives that are aligned to measurable outcomes.

Attachment:- template.rar