Thank you very much for taking the time out to assist me with completing this assignment within a timely manner. I will apply to this service again in the future. i am really impressed with the hardwork . good points good elaboration. Thanks

0 (0%) - 13 (13%) Writing is well below graduate-level writing expectations. Paper: . Uses unclear and inappropriate language; and/or . Has many errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; and/or . Lacks organization in a way that creates confusion for the reader; and/or . Contains many direct quotes from original source materials and/or consistently and poorly paraphrases rather than using original language; and/or . Lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it and/or incorrect use of APA. Total Points: 100 Name: DDPA_8200_Weeks_2+5+6+8_Assignment_Rubric Description: This rubric will be used to evaluate the submitted written work for Assignments. There are three primary quality indicators (Responsiveness to Paper or Writing Assignment, Content Knowledge, and Quality of Writing), worth a total of 100 points. The rubric below is a guide on elements that should be included in your Assignments.

16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Writing is scholarly and meets graduate-level writing expectations. Paper: . Uses language that is clear; . Has a few errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; . Is well organized, logical, and clear; . Uses original language and uses direct quotes when necessary and/or appropriate; . Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it; Provides correct APA citations about a source when citing or paraphrasing it. 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Writing is somewhat below graduate-level writing expectations. Paper: . Uses language that is unclear and/or inappropriate; and/or . Has more than occasional errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax and/or lacks correct APA citations; and/or . Is poorly organized, is at times unclear and confusing, and has some problems with logical flow; and/or . Reflects an underuse of original language and an overuse of direct quotes and paraphrases; and/or . Sometimes lacks information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it.

Quality of Writing-20 points 18 (18%) - 20 (20%) Writing is scholarly and exceeds graduate-level writing expectations. Paper: . Uses language that is clear, concise, and appropriate; . Has few, if any, errors in spelling, grammar, and syntax; . Is extremely well organized, logical, clear, and never confuses the reader; . Uses a preponderance of original language and uses direct quotes only when necessary and/or appropriate; . Provides information about a source when citing or paraphrasing it; . Consistently uses correct APA form and style (including citations, references, use of nonbiased language, clear organization, good editorial style, etc.) with very few or no errors.

28 (28%) - 31 (31%) Paper or writing Assignment demonstrates/provides: . Minimal understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course, and, although generally accurate, displays some omissions and/or errors; and/or . Few and/or irrelevant examples; and/or . Few, if any, thought-provoking ideas, little original thinking; and/or . "Regurgitated" knowledge rather than critical thinking; . Little mastery of skills and/or numerous errors when using the knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course. 0 (0%) - 27 (27%) Paper or writing Assignment demonstrates/provides: . A lack of understanding of the concepts and issues presented in the course, and/or application is inaccurate and contains many omissions and/or errors; and/or . No examples or irrelevant examples; and/or . No thought-provoking ideas or original thinking; and/or . No critical thinking; . Many critical errors when applying knowledge, skills, or strategies presented in the course.

Paper or writing Assignment is responsive to and meets the requirements given in the instructions. It: . Responds to the assigned or selected topic; . Is substantive and evidence-based; . Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and . Is submitted by the due date. 28 (28%) - 31 (31%) Paper or writing Assignment is somewhat responsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: . Somewhat misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or . Lacks in substance, relying more on anecdotal than scholarly evidence; and/or . Contains little evidence that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and . Is submitted by the due date. 0 (0%) - 27 (27%) Paper or writing Assignment is unresponsive to the requirements given in the instructions. It: . Misses the point of the assigned or selected topic; and/or .

Description: This rubric will be used to evaluate the submitted written work for Assignments. There are three primary quality indicators (Responsiveness to Paper or Writing Assignment, Content Knowledge, and Quality of Writing), worth a total of 100 points. The rubric below is a guide on elements that should be included in your Assignments. Grid View List View A: Exemplary B: Meets the Standard C: Progressing F: Emerging Responsiveness to a Paper or Writing Assignment-40 points 36 (36%) - 40 (40%) Paper or writing Assignment is responsive to and exceeds the requirements given in the instructions. It: . Responds to the assigned or selected topic; . Goes beyond what is required in some meaningful way (e.g., ideas contribute a new dimension to what we know about the topic, unearths something unanticipated); . Is substantive and evidence-based; . Demonstrates that the student has read, viewed, and considered the Learning Resources in the course and that the paper topic connects in a meaningful way to the course content; and . Is submitted by the due date.