Thanks Experts Mind for providing me the correct and accurate solution as I was really tensed for this assignment. You guys are really great in providing the assignment solution.

Use the FINAL SUBMISSION facility on Turnitin to submit the final version of your assignment. It will be your final submission. You can only submit one document. Hence, your entire assignment should be compiled as one document. Do not attach the assignment cover sheet to this submission. Your assignment MUST be submitted via Turnitin by 5.30pm 1st October. Only one person (on behalf of the group) should submit the final assignment online. Please note that a Hard Copy should also be submitted by placing it in the assignment submission box located on level 11 of the BA building (opposite lifts); or to your lecturer by the respective deadline. An Assignment coversheet should be attached to the Hardcopy submission only. This facility provides a matching service which will compare final submissions with a significant database of web published resources, including online databases and journals.

Quality of referencing (10%) Makes extensive use of relevant academic journal articles and other appropriate sources. All sources are cited correctly in text and referenced correctly according to Swinburne Harvard style. (8-10 marks) Reasonable use of relevant academic journal articles and other appropriate sources. However, sources are predominantly non- refereed work. Sources are mostly cited correctly in text and referenced correctly according to Swinburne Harvard style. (7-8 marks) Some use of academic journal articles and other appropriate sources. Most sources are cited in text and referenced appropriately at end of report. (6-7 marks)

Quality of Executive Summary (10%) Outstanding summary of the key points of the report. Clear and concise. Words used economically. (8-10 marks) Good summary of the key points of the report. Clearly worded. (7-8 marks) Good summary of the key points of the report. Some points missed. Long winded. (6-7 marks) Acceptable summary of the key points of the report. Number of points missed. Lacks a clear structure. (5-6 marks) Poor summary of the key points of the report. (<5 marks)

Conclusion and recommendations (10%) Outstanding conclusion, drawing together the key findings and original thought. Recommendations are clear, concise, logical and convincing. (8-10 marks) Conclusion draws together the key findings and original thought. Clear and coherent recommendations. Some support is needed to make the conclusions and recommendations convincing. (7-8 marks) Conclusion draws on most of the findings and some original thought. Makes adequate recommendations but some gaps exist. (6-7 marks) Acceptable conclusion providing key findings and recommendations. Some points missed. (5-6 marks) Poor conclusions and unrelated recommendations. (<5 marks)

Addressing the assignment tasks (10%) All requirements of the assignment are addressed. Coverage of requirements is well balanced. (8-10 marks) Majority of the requirements of the assignment addressed adequately. Coverage of requirements is balanced overall. (7-8 marks) Majority of the requirements of the assignment addressed adequately. But coverage of requirements is unbalanced. Disproportionate emphasis on some issues. (6-7 marks) At least half of the requirements of the assignment addressed. But coverage of requirements is unbalanced. Disproportionate emphasis on selected issues. (5-6 marks) Most requirements of the assignment are not addressed. Disproportionate emphasis on selected issues. (<5 marks)

Competently research and analysed. Good use of relevant material. Majority of relevant issues identified and discussed. Arguments relating to most positive and negative aspects are presented. Some arguments may be underdeveloped. Good application of research perspectives to the analysis. (18-21 marks) Minimal research and analysis. Basic use of relevant material. Little analysis and discussion of relevant issues. Arguments relating to some positive and/or negative aspects are presented. Some arguments may be underdeveloped, unclear or not adequately supported. Adequate application of research perspectives to the analysis. (15-18 marks) Inadequate research and analysis. Less than basic use of relevant material. Little analysis and discussion of relevant issues. Majority of the relevant issues are not identified. Arguments are basic, not supported, incoherent and one-sided. Poor application of research perspectives to the analysis. (<15 marks)

Analysis and argument (research, logic and coherence of argument) (30%) Very thoroughly researched and analysed. Effective use of relevant material for forming arguments. Comprehensive identification and discussion of issues. Critically evaluates material. Makes persuasive arguments relating to both positive and negative aspects. Excellent application of research perspectives to the analysis. (24-30 marks) Well researched and analysed. Appropriate use of relevant material for forming arguments. Adequate identification and discussion of issues. Evidence of some critically evaluation of material. Makes somewhat convincing arguments relating to both positive and negative aspects. Very good application of research perspectives to the analysis. (21-24 marks)

Excellent/High Distinction (80-100%) Very good/Distinction (70-80%) Good/Credit (60-70%) Satisfactory/ Pass (50-60%) Unsatisfactory/No pass (0-50%) Knowledge and understanding of the topic (20%) Demonstrates thorough understanding of the topic gained from extensive use of relevant sources. Excellent selection of relevant journal articles and other references. (16-20 marks) Demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. But some gaps in the knowledge exist. Good selection of relevant journal articles and other references. (14-16 marks) Demonstrates basic understanding of the topic with gaps in the knowledge of the topic. Have selected some relevant journal articles and other references. (12-14 marks) Demonstrates some understanding of the topic obtained from a few key sources. Several gaps in the knowledge of the topic. Includes journal articles and other references that are of little relevance. (10-12 marks) Unsatisfactory understanding of the topic and extensive gaps in knowledge. Inadequate use of relevant journal articles and other references. (<10 marks)

The assignment must be submitted as a group. A group may consist of up to 3 students. A group project is the collective responsibility of the entire group, and if one member is temporarily unable to contribute, the group should be able to reallocate responsibilities to keep to schedule. In the event of longer-term illness, other serious problems involving a member of a project group or where equal contributions are not forthcoming and this cannot be resolved by the students themselves, it is the responsibility of the other members to make the project supervisor aware of the situation straight away.

Presentation is an important feature of any Research report. The following guide to presentation gives a general outline to report writing. Title Page Table of Contents Executive Summary (should not exceed 300 words) Introduction and Purpose • State aims of the research report • Outline contents of research report • Sources of data Body of the Report • Analysis and discussion of issues • Interpretation and discussion of data Conclusion • Summary of your analysis and interpretation; findings and results of your work Appendices • Include raw data, charts and tables that are not essential to be included in the body of your report • Calculations used or referred to Bibliography • References used

Marks: This Research Assignment represents 30% (or 30 marks) of the total assessment. • 25% (25 marks) relates to your submission (due Mon 1st October 2018) • 5% (5 marks) relates to your class presentation (week beg 1st October 2018) Due Date: Written submission due on Monday 1st October 2018 (5.30pm) • Group Presentations in Class week beginning 1st October 2018 Word Length: 2,000 words (excluding executive summary, footnotes, references and appendices).