Should be according to Australian Laws Message from student: I have send u two attachments now, rest info regarding this topic ill send u side by side but most importantly this case needs to cover sec180(1) with relevant examples of cases like Asic vs Adler n soloman vs soloman and otger laws of director duties and ill send u synopsis of case through google in morning

Written Assignment: Identify the facts of the case 10% Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case 10% Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case 10% Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case 10% Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. I 0% ASSESSMENT TOTAL 100% SUBJECT TOTAL /30%

Written Assignment: Identify the acts of the case All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed. Written Assignment: Explain the relevant law relating to the case All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed. and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. All of the relevant law Is clearly and accurately detailed. Written Assignment: Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there Is a synthesis with the relevant law. All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed. Written Assignment: Summarise the judgement of the case The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed. Written Assignment: Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. The role. purpose. and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear. logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.

Group oral presentation and visual slides I At all times: I. the group was cohesive and courteous: 2. the oral presentations were clear and ,understandable: 3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case: eugauing: 4. the presentation slides were logical and structured: and 5. the oral presentations were interesting and engaging. At all times: I. the group was cohesive and courteous: 2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable: 3. the cad presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case: and 4. the presentation slides were logical and 'tinctured.