Discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is excellent. Critically reviewed all strategies excellently. Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence. The answer is complete in all respects. (15-20 marks) Complete evaluation on Critical Reflections 10 Marks received /Total marks 100

Deliverable (Poster presentation) Overall design and contents of poster (5 marks) Presentation skill; Q & A (5 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 2) (Turnitin based Submission) Adequate details provided but very generic. However the overall answer is in the context of Construction projects case study. Factors / issues / challenges explored partially. (1-14 marks) Strategies explored and discussion of transformation of IT in Intel is good. Critically reviewed the strategies. Evidence of reading and analyzing case study. Overall good attempt. (15-24 marks) 20

Marks Maximum marks Work Proposal: (Turnitin based Submission) Proposal is incomplete but has relevant information (1-6 marks) Complete and excellent proposal (7-10 marks) 10 Deliverable (Task 1) (Turnitin based Submission) Research article ? Approach to the problem and research questions; objectives; (10 marks) ? Rigor of literature review; (10 marks) ? Methods or empirical analysis techniques; used data sources; (10 marks) ? Key findings and conclusions; (10 marks) ? Citations and referencing ( 5 marks) ? IEEE format; Academic writing (5 marks) 50

• Provide an adequate individual contribution For a mark of 40-49% • Show a barely adequate understanding of the purpose of the exercise. • Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and attempt to apply them. • Provide evidence of reading limited relevant literature. • Attempt some analysis and discussion. • Show some ability to link theory to problems and provide solutions. • Provide some individual contribution For a mark of 25-39% • Made an attempt to complete the exercise. • Show little or no understanding of the principles, theories, and practices involved. • No evidence of academic reading. • An inability to recognize the key points.

For a mark of 60-69% • Show a clear understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of most of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points and analyse them and draw sound conclusions. • Provide approaches that are creative and pragmatic. • Provide a supported critique of your own work. • Provide supported, discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a good individual contribution For a mark of 50-59% • Show an adequate understanding of the activity. • Display knowledge of some of the principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them. • Provide evidence of some reading related to the proposal. • Demonstrate an ability to select key points in the exercise and analyse them. • Provide approaches that are less creative or might not be entirely practical. • Provide a critique of your own work. • Provide discussions of further research that may be needed.

Assessment Criteria The assignment will be assessed out of 100 marks using the below mentioned criteria. For a mark of >69% • Show a thorough understanding of the purpose of the activity. • Display knowledge of the major principles, theories, methodologies, and practices involved and an ability to apply them effectively. • Provide evidence of wide reading, including academic journals. • Demonstrate an ability to select critical points, evaluate them and communicate the conclusions effectively. • Provide approaches that are creative, practicable, and supported. • Provide a sound, supported critique of your own work. • Provide sound and supported discussions of further research that may be needed. • Provide a very good individual contribution

Submit a work proposal for this assignment on 9th, which must include: Understanding of deliverables – a detailed description of deliverables. General overview of the given tasks – (Part A and Part B) - initial understanding of solution to all tasks with timeline to complete them and identification of literature resources. (10 marks) You should prepare an assignment of a single word file containing Part A and Part B.