Reference no: EM131252928
Expected payoffs in a variant of BoS with imperfect information:-
Construct tables like the one in Figure 1 for type n1 of player 1, and for types y2 and n2 of player 2. I claim that ((B, B), (B, S)) and ((S, B), (S, S)) are Nash equilibria of the game, where in each case the first component gives the actions of the two types of player 1

And the second component gives the actions of the two types of player 2. Using Figure 1 you may verify that B is a best response of type y1 of player 1 to the pair (B, S) of actions of player 2, and S is a best response to the pair of actions (S, S).
You may use your answer to verify that in each of the claimed Nash equilibria the action of type n1 of player 1 and the action of each type of player 2 is a best response to the other players' actions. In each of these examples a Nash equilibrium is a list of actions, one for each type of each player, such that the action of each type of each player is a best response to the actions of all the types of the other player, given the player's beliefs about the state after she observes her signal.
The actions planned by the various types of player i are not relevant to the decision problem of any type of player i, but there is no harm in taking them, as well as the actions of the types of the other player, as given when player i is choosing an action. Thus we may define a Nash equilibrium in each example to be a Nash equilibrium of the strategic game in which the set of players is the set of all types of all players in the original situation.
In the next section I define the general notion of a Bayesian game, and the notion of Nash equilibrium in such a game. These definitions require significant theoretical development. If you find the theory in the next section heavy-going, you may be able to skim the section and then study the subsequent illustrations, relying on the intuition developed in the examples in this section, and returning to the theory only as necessary for clarification.
Various theories on free trade
: What are some various theories on free trade? Please give some examples as to what countries have used them and any success they've had.
|
What are the time and space efficiencies of your algorithm
: Binomial coefficient Design an efficient algorithm for computing the binomial coefficient C(n, k) that uses no multiplications. What are the time and space efficiencies of your algorithm?
|
Possible defect in the steering mechanism
: An automobile manufacturer is conducting a product recall after it was discovered that a possible defect in the steering mechanism could cause loss of control in certain cars. The recall covers a span of three model years. The company sent out let..
|
Explain the conversation you would have with the employee
: Formulate the conversation you would have with the employee, based the concepts found in Chapter 2 in your textbook. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements.
|
Payoffs in a variant of bos with imperfect information
: Verify that B is a best response of type y1 of player 1 to the pair (B, S) of actions of player 2, and S is a best response to the pair of actions (S, S).
|
Finding the length of the longest path in a dag
: Design an efficient algorithm for finding the length of the longest path in a dag. (This problem is important both as a prototype of many other dynamic programming applications and in its own right because it determines the minimal time needed for..
|
Design a dynamic programming algorithm
: Design a dynamic programming algorithm and indicate its time efficiency. (The algorithm may be useful for, say, finding the largest free square area on a computer screen or for selecting a construction site.)
|
Flesch reading ease score
: Explain your findings. Based on the readability tests you conducted, assess whether you consider the excerpt contains language which would be suitable for a business document and enhances readability. The excerpt should be supplied by mail/fax or ..
|
Determine the preferred course of action
: Determine the range of values of the probability that SAEL will exercise its option, making the decision found in part c as optimal, and determine the expected value of perfect information about whether SAEL will exercise its option.
|