Reference no: EM131127747
In as much detail as possible answer the following: Remember to PARAPHRASE, do not cut and paste from the textbook or any source.
DISTINGUISHED AD AGENCY:
Distinguished Ad Agency (DAA) had been in business for about 10 years. It had a strong regional reputation, and counted divisions of five Fortune 500 firms among its clients. Manuel Novedad, cofounder and president, had built the firm on a foundation of client focus, adherence to a quality system, and rapid response.
One of their largest customers, a Fortune 500 consumer products company, required compliance to jointly developed protocols and a mature quality management system, but not to registration under ISO. A documented system was in place, and Novedad chaired an active steering committee. Members were department heads, including the quality manager, and the union president. System upgrades were made on a routine basis. However, this valued customer, Megaproducts, Incorporated, had missed a scheduled launch date for a new, potentially important mega-product because of miscommunications with DAA’s project team and faulty ad copy, which had to be revised after being sent to the printer. These problems could have been prevented if DAA’s protocols had been followed and required quality checks had been performed.
Time was a factor because noncompliant product had been reaching the customer despite DAA’s assurances that protocols were being followed. Much of the documentation had been written by the quality manager and edited by the president. Review by managers and supervisors, who were asked to implement applicable elements in their departments, was minimal. Consequently, many of the procedures and instructions did not reflect work realities. They depicted an ideal and were ultimately challenged as supervisors and process operators tried to implement them. But, since the clock was ticking and Megaproducts was threatening to cancel orders, implementation proceeded with promises of a complete quality management system revision once improvements were in place.
Making the quality system operable was chaotic. Managers, not wanting to appear unsure of their changed responsibilities and authority, clung to the status quo. Training—when done—focused on lower level employees, which left supervisors without a good understanding of new requirements. They were caught saying one thing but doing another. Interfaces between departments and individuals, although described in an organizational chart and statements of authority and responsibility, were not truly functional. System workflow faltered because new relationships and interdependencies encountered old departmental barriers. Audit reports and corrective actions languished because the president periodically overrode the quality manager’s authority, fearing delivery promises might be compromised. However, early implementation steps were handled well. Gaps and shortfalls were identified, and proposed solutions recommended. But, because of time, it was assumed that acceptance and adoption would be automatic. Steering committee members rationalized that everyone knew what needed to be done because solution finding had been such a fervent effort. However, like many improvement projects, concluding steps were inadequately thought through and poorly managed. Proposed solutions were not completely integrated into daily activities.
Eventually the Steering Committee realized that they lacked a comprehensive plan that would make system changes truly operational. The Committee understood that this created indecision at supervisory levels, plus inadequate coordination and dissatisfaction by those trying to make the changes workable. They saw that first-line design project managers, writers, and artists were trying to maintain a sense of order and get their work done by falling back on customary routines. Amazingly, their “stopgap” actions allowed them to get some of the Megaproducts projects back on schedule, but they realized that they must go back to the drawing board to develop a comprehensive plan. Time was running out.
Discussion Questions
1. What mistakes did Novedad and the Steering Committee make in the initial development of the protocols and documentation and the early implementation stage?
2. What were the early indications that the system was not working as planned, and why were they ignored? Why weren’t improvement efforts more effective?
3. Now that Novedad and the Steering Committee have received their “wake-up” call, what steps should be taken to revise and implement an improved, workable quality management system?
Sales the only factor that may impact the company profits
: The owner of a small printing company is considering the purchase of additional printing equipment to expand her business. If the owner expands the business and sales are high, projected profits (minus the cost of the equipment) should be $90,000; if..
|
Quality ids company purchased plastic laminating equipment
: Quality IDs Company purchased plastic laminating equipment on July 1, 2008, for $15,660. The equipment was expected to have a useful life of three years, or 18,825 operating hours, and a residual value of $600.
|
What is metadrama
: What is "metadrama"? Write a one-page essay that usesA Midsummer Night's Dreamand at least one other play to explain the concept of metadrama. You can use course materials, including the metadrama handout, but you cannot do research on the intern..
|
How much orbital area will the asteroid sweep out this year
: A certain asteroid was observed to sweep out an orbital area of 450 billion square kilometers during the year 2015. How much orbital area will the asteroid sweep out this year? How much orbital area did the asteroid sweep out during this semester's S..
|
Make in initial development of the protocols
: Distinguished Ad Agency (DAA) had been in business for about 10 years. It had a strong regional reputation, and counted divisions of five Fortune 500 firms among its clients. Manuel Novedad, cofounder and president, had built the firm on a foundation..
|
Calculate the apparent power and the power factor
: If it has a resistance of 30 Ω and an inductance of 0.5 H, calculate the apparent power and the power factor.
|
Find the stationary distribution
: Find the stationary distribution - What percentage of time (on average) are no machines operable?
|
Find all stationary distributions
: What is the expected number of steps before it returns to 1 - How many times, on average, does the chain visit 2 between two consecutive visits to 1?
|
Used in surgery to induce unconsciousness
: Anesthesia is used in surgery to induce unconsciousness. One problem with drug-induced unconsciousness is large differences in patient responsiveness. Furthermore, the patient response changes during an operation.
|