Reference no: EM132291358
1. Carl, a homosexual male, was employed as a landscape designer with Splendid Gardens Landscape and design, a private LLC located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The company employs 10 other employees. Carl complains to his supervisor that he is being teased about his sexual prowess with women. After complaining, he is fired on October 1, 2012. Carl does nothing more until October 1, 2013 when he meets with you to ask for help in filing suit. You advise that:
A. Carl can file a sexual orientation discrimination suit against Splendid Gardens Landscape under Title VII because he is within the statute of limitations.
B. Carl can file a sexual orientation discrimination claim against Splendid Gardens Landscape under the NMHRA.
C. Carl can file a gender discrimination suit against Splendid Gardens Landscape under Title VII.
D. Carl cannot file any discrimination suit against Splendid Gardens Landscape under Title VII or the NMHRA because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
2. In National Treasury Employees v. Von Raab, the Supreme Court determined that the U.S. Customs Service’s use of a drug-screening program:
A. Did not violate their employees’ Fourteenth Amendment Rights
B. Violated their employees’ Fourteenth Amendment Rights
C. Did not violate their employees’ Fourth Amendment Rights
D. Violated their employees’ Fourth Amendment Rights
3. Medicare Fraud can entail:
Billing for missed patient appointments
Making referrals to providers for which the referrer has a financial interest
Paying for referrals
Adjusting claims submissions to maximize reimbursement
All are correct
1 and 3 are correct
1 and 4 are correct
1,2, 3 are correct