I got my assignment as per my requirements. I am overwhelmed with the way you handled this task and gave me before my deadline. Would like to share my all the assignment work with your team and want the results to be the same as it was now.

Overall grades are based on the following: High Distinction (29.5-35) (Excellent level of written discussion, use of sources, structure, writing standard, referencing, styling): All HD levels, one C/D allowed. Distinction (26-29)(Very good level of written discussion, use of sources, structure, writing standard, referencing, styling): All D level or above, one P/C allowed. Credit (22.5-25.5)(Good level of written discussion, use of sources, structure, writing standard, referencing, styling): All C level or above, two Ps allowed. Pass (17.5-22)(Basic and sound level of written discussion, use of sources, structure, writing standard, referencing, styling): All P level or above, two Fs allowed. Fail (0-17) (Poor level of written discussion, use of sources, structure, writing standard and referencing or styling): Three or more Fs will constitute a Fail grade, regardless of grades achieved for other components. GRADE: COMMENT:

Referencing (APA) style Referencingis inconsistent and technically incorrect.Essay has no or minimal reference list, mixed styles. Annotated list is incorrectly styled. Basic and sound attempt to reference sources. May be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style.Essay reference may have 1 or 2 references missing. Annotated list is mostly correctly styled. Good attempt to reference sources. Some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed. Annotated list is correct and styled well. Very goodattempt to reference sources. Minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed.Annotated list is correct with a clear and consistent style. Excellent level of referencing and acknowledgment. No errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed.Annotated list is without stylistic error.

Writing standard Poor standard of writing. Basic and sound standard of writing. Some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Good standard of writing. Few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Very good standard of writing. Very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Excellentstandard of writing. No errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling.

Essay structure/ Reference list structure Topic, concepts and discussion are not clear in introduction. Material and discussion in the bodygenerally poorly sequenced. No discernible conclusion. No links to introduction. List incorrectly ordered or poorly presented. Wordcount not met. Topic, concepts and discussiongenerally stated with some clarity in introduction. Material and discussion in body generally logically sequenced withsome weaknesses. Conclusion does not clearly summarise discussion; links to introductionnot clear.List presented satisfactorily. Wordcount met. Topic, concepts and discussionmostly clearly conveyed in introduction. Material and discussion in bodylogically and clearly sequenced; few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises discussion; may be some weaknesses; generally clear links to introduction.List well-presented. Wordcount met. Topic, concepts and discussionclearly conveyed in introduction. Material and discussion in bodylogically and clearly sequenced; very few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion mostly effectively summarises discussion; clear links to introduction.Very good presentation of list. Wordcount met.

Use of sources to support assignment Little evidence of research. Sources are missing, inappropriate, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link between sources and assignment. Less than 10 annotated sources. Basic and sound research. Basic use of sources to support assignment, generally well integrated, most sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application. Research is generally thorough. Good use of sources to support assignment, mostly well integrated, sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application. Thorough researchindicated. Very good use of sources to support assignment, well integrated, sources are credible. May be minor weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application. Thorough researchindicated. Excellent use of sources to support assignment, well integrated, sources are credible. Very minor, if any, weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration/application.

Good use of sources to support assignment, mostly well integrated, Lacks clear link between sources and assignment. sources are credible. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or Topic addressed thoroughly and analyses in depth.

COMM11003 Assessment Item 1 Marking Criteria: Essay/Annotated Reference List(35% of overall grade) Student: FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION Written discussion/ Written annotations Discussion lacks coherence. Topic is poorly addressed; little analysis. Discussion is generally coherent. Topic addressed and analyses in reasonable depth with some description. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow. Discussion is coherent and flows well. Topicaddressed quite thoroughly and analyses in considerable depth. There may be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow. Discussion is very coherent and flows well. Topic addressed thoroughly and analyses in depth. There may be minor inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow. Excellent work.Discussion is very coherent and flows well. Topic addressed thoroughly and analyses in great depth. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with flow.