Reference no: EM131429591
Using the GSS data project and multinomial logistic regression, this project aims to answer the following question: What determines which religion people will belong to? The options are: Protestant, Catholic, Jewish or no religion. (He excluded all other religions from the analysis.) As predictors, it includes: an index of the respondent's family's overall socioeconomic status (SES) when s/he was growing up, Pr_SES, with a mean of approximately 0 and a standard deviation of about 0.8; whether the respondent was African-American or not, Black (yes=1, no=0); and whether the respondent's age is greater than 55 (Older=1)
or not (Older=0). A little more about Pr_SES: Researchers wanted to make an index to capture a hypothesized latent variable of parental socioeconomic status (SES), so he calculated the Cronbach's alpha of three standardized variables: Father's education (Paeduc), mother's highest degree (Madeg), and the relative ranking of family income when the respondent was age 16 (Incom16). He gets an alpha=0.668.
The output is in the following table.
1. Interpret both the logit and the relative risk ratio on Older for the category of "None" from Model 1 and Model 3 in Table 6. What substantive conclusion do you draw from those coefficients?
2. The researcher hypothesized that because Protestantism was the dominant religion in the United States for the earlier part of the 20th century, and especially for the elites, that the older someone was and the more affluent there family was, the more likely they would be Protestant vs. being some other religion. Looking at the interactions in Model 2 in Table 1, does that theory find support? Speak to this in general and then also specifically by interpreting the relevant interactions and main effects.
3. There is a potential issue with interpreting interactions in the context of logit models, especially if we try to provide predicted probabilities or as odds-ratios or relative-risk ratios. Explain what the issue is of getting predicted probabilities or converting to odds-ratios or relative-risk ratios from interactions in logit models, like the multinomial one above.
Exaggerated fear of terrorists
: Temple University mathematics professor used these data to show that most Americans have an exaggerated fear of terrorists [19]:
|
Determine the magnitude of the couple
: Three shafts and four gears are used to form a gear train which will transmit 7.5 kW from the motor at A to a machine tool at F. (Bearings for the shafts are omitted from the sketch.)
|
Percent of the guilty defendants
: Assume that 90 percent of all defendants are guilty, 90 percent of the guilty defendants are convicted, and 90 percent of the innocent defendants are set free.
|
Analyze the respective roles of federal and state authority
: Identify one (1) member of Congress who has been charged with ethics violations. Briefly discuss the reason for the charges and provide two (2) reasons why you agree or disagree with the verdict and any penalties. Provide examples to support your ..
|
Interpret both the logit and the relative risk ratio
: 1. Interpret both the logit and the relative risk ratio on Older for the category of "None" from Model 1 and Model 3 in Table 6. What substantive conclusion do you draw from those coefficients?
|
Find the time required for the angular velocity of cylinder
: Two uniform cylinders, each of weight W = 14 lb and radius r = 5 in., are connected by a belt as shown.
|
How do we overcome its inherent downsides
: What is the business's value proposition and it sources of competitive advantage?Which organizational activities directly deliver on that value proposition-and, by contrast, which activities can the company afford to perform in a way equivalent to ..
|
Create a tiered healthcare system
: Create a tiered healthcare system where more money equates to a better quality of care (ObamaCare)." This makes everything very unfair for those who can afford health insurance.
|
Describe the relative costs of each strategy you present
: Draft a set of company policies that would help to avoid the loss of more than one key executive in a single crisis. Describe the relative costs of each strategy you present
|