Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
We as a society have to ask the question, "How much is enough"? Organizations are organized and ran by societal constructs. Individuals come into organizations with their unique views and beliefs and sometimes those unique beliefs and values transcend into their work ethic or management style. Unfortunately, individual constructs are usually not aligned with organizations vision and this is how conflict and disassociations are triggered creating a atmosphere of individualism. Organizations all have visions and leadership is organized based on the perception of flow down and commitment. Consequently leadership is responsible for organizational culture and attitude.
In my observation, the lower the leadership level the more disconnected they tend to be from organizational constructs and vision. It is very difficult for organizations to manage and supervise from the top and is why managers are hired at lower levels. The concept is to hire an individual to directly and intimately manage a group while carrying out organizations vision. The problem that I have observed over the years is that not all leaders/managers buy into the organizations vision and are self serving. Why is this? Is it that they feel slighted by the organizations and that they feel they deserve more or is it that they are trying to obtain what they perceive as wealth and prestige based on society's standards? Society if flooded via media and other social forums what is considered to be wealthy is the US and what is perceived to be successful. Therefore, individuals join organizations with the their vision as to how to obtain that perceived status. Which I feel is creating individuals that are not committed to organizations goals but to their personal agenda.
The other side of leadership is the fact that organizations appear to be solely about making profit for their shareholders and the mere perception of this has created an environment of disconnect between individual workers and the organizations. Individuals are not committed to the organizations and the organizations are not committed to their individual employees. I get the whole idea of investors wanting to make money and increase their investment; however, it cannot be the sole driving force behind major decisions in organizations. I am living in a time where companies are so competitive in regards to retaining and obtaining business that they sacrifice their long time employees for the sake of increasing the bottom line. I am talking about billion dollars companies laying off employees that make a meager $50K a year but still find it necessary to reward executives million of dollars. Somehow that does not seem logical nor does it seem realistic. Terminating 100 employees that salaries range between $50K - $150K but continue to pay executives millions plus millions in bonus. That math and logic just doesn't seem to add up. So I ask again, how much money is enough to live a comfortable and sustainable lifestyle in the US?
How can the company prevent this type of crisis from happening in the future?
Explain ethical standards are objectively-determined by religious and moral experts and what is deemed right or wrong, fair or unfair, moral or immoral, ethical or unethical
Based on the subsequent statement below can those who do bad things be termed leaders as well as what can we learn from such leaders?
From the perspective of the quality of life for the entrepreneur which is better: To run a private company or to run a public company? Why? Provide real-life examples from the business world. What would you suggest to improve the quality of life issu..
What is the relationship of constructive ethical practices to organizational performance? Please support your answers with examples, from real life if possible.
as a counter-argument to training leaders organizations spend billions of dollars on leadership training every year.
Discuss which kind of group you would form and why. Deliberate the advantages and disadvantages of the using groups to make decisions
Propose methodologies that have been proven to increase value in health care delivery systems and examine leadership and management frameworks that are most applicable to a certain organization type within the health care industry.
You've just learned that your primary competitor has just cut their prices to the consumer by 7%. Illustrate what might be some reasons that would support their decision to make a price reduction? Illustrate what should be your thoughtful reaction..
Explain why. How can external validity and internal validity affect one another?
emergent technologiesemergent technologies may create entirely new ethical problems for the business of health care.
Make recommendations on the requirements for the feasibility study and discuss the pros and cons for the design of SDLC with a recommendation for an optimal time frame for each stage.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd