Reference no: EM131617233

Question: Reconsider Problem. In order to reduce the heating cost of the hot water, it is proposed to insulate the side and bottom surfaces of the container with 5-cm-thick fiberglass insulation (k = 0.035 W/m.K) and to wrap the insulation with aluminum foil (ε = 0.1) in order to minimize the heat loss by radiation. An estimate is obtained from a local insulation contractor, who proposes to do the insulation job for $350, including materials and labor. Would you support this proposal? How long will it take for the insulation to pay for itself from the energy it saves? Evaluate air properties at a film temperature of 23°C and 1 atm pressure. Is this a good assumption?

Problem: Reconsider Prob. 9-44. In order to reduce the heating cost of the hot water, it is proposed to insulate the side and bottom surfaces of the container with 5-cm-thick fiberglass insulation (k = 0.035 W/m.K) and to wrap the insulation with aluminum foil (ε = 0.1) in order to minimize the heat loss by radiation. An estimate is obtained from a local insulation contractor, who proposes to do the insulation job for $350, including materials and labor. Would you support this proposal? How long will it take for the insulation to pay for itself from the energy it saves? Evaluate air properties at a film temperature of 23°C and 1 atm pressure. Is this a good assumption?