How did the participants at the meeting frame their argument

Assignment Help Operation Management

Reference no: EM132140418

Observational Exercise

Managing Conflict

Purpose

1. To become aware of the dimensions of interpersonal conflict

2. To explore how to use Fisher and Ury's (1981) method of principled negotiation to address actual conflict

Directions

1. For this exercise, you are being asked to observe an actual conflict. Attend a public meeting at which a conflict is being addressed. For example, you could attend a meeting of the campus planning board, which has on its agenda changes in student parking fees.

2. Take notes on the meeting, highlighting the positions and interests of all the people who participated in the meeting.

Questions

1. How did the participants at the meeting frame their arguments? What positions did individuals take at the meeting?

2. Identify and describe the interests of each of the participants at the meeting.

3. Discuss whether the participants were able to be objective in their approaches to the problem. Describe how the people involved were able to separate themselves from the problem.

4. In what ways did the participants seek to find mutually beneficial solutions to their conflict?

Reflection and Action Worksheet

Managing Conflict

Reflection

1. How do you react to conflict? Based on the Conflict Style Questionnaire, how would you describe your conflict style? How has your past history influenced your conflict style?

2. This chapter describes three kinds of relational conflict (i.e., esteem, control, affiliation). Of the three kinds, which is most common in the conflicts you have with others? Discuss.

Action

1. Briefly describe an actual conflict you had with a family member, roommate, or coworker in the recent past. Identify the positions and interests of both you and the other person in the conflict. (Note: Individuals' positions may be easier to identify than their interests. Be creative in detailing your interests and the other person's.)

2. Describe how you could fractionate the conflict.

3. Using Fisher and Ury's (1981) methods, describe how you could separate the person from the problem and how you could work together to address the conflict. During your discussions, how could you help the other party in the conflict save face? How could the other party help you save face?

Reference no: EM132140418

Questions Cloud

Effective leadership contribute to the success of initiative : How did effective leadership contribute to the success of this initiative?

What is big data : How are Facebook and other companies using this data about you to make money and are you ok with it?

Calculate the batter hitting percentage : Check the hitting percentage to determine if it is above .300. If it is, output that the player is eligible for the All Stars Game; otherwise

Discuss about the discrete nature of emotion : Use the assertion by Lazurus relating to the discrete nature of emotion to further evalaute Seyle's ideas. Support your answer with relevant and scholarly.

How did the participants at the meeting frame their argument : How do you react to conflict? Based on the Conflict Style Questionnaire, how would you describe your conflict style?

Determine the key transformational qualities : Determine the key transformational qualities the leader possesses - Discuss a leader who you would consider to be transformational

How the anxiety-performance relationship is explained : Compare and contrast how the anxiety-performance relationship is explained by the individual zones of optimal functioning model, multidimensional anxiety theory

In the context of human resource management challenges : In the context of human resource management challenges, which of the following statements is true of older workers?

Assuming the arrival times are exponentially distributed : Assuming the arrival times are exponentially distributed and each customer may spend anywhere between 1-5 minutes at the machine.

User Account

All Pages