Reference no: EM134016436

Assignment:

Throughout this course, we have explored how it is necessary to prove that free actions are necessary to justify the existence of normative ethics. We have explored three major theoretical frameworks; virtue ethics, deontology, and utilitarianism. Virtue ethics (Aristotle) explores the moral character of the agent by pursuing virtue through excellence. Deontology (Immanuel Kant) is concerned with the rational formulation of a categorical imperative that ought to inform the moral agent how to act (or not) according to the rational dictate. Utilitarianism (J.S. Mill) distinguishes between the higher and lower pleasures, and the evaluation of consequences as the frame of reference to make moral decisions.

• What is the issue that you chose to discuss? Why did you choose the issue?
• Do you agree or disagree with the author? (This is your moral position/perspective)
• What theory is helpful in supporting your moral position? (Here you should refer to the readings of Aristotle, Kant, or Mill in the corresponding modules)
• What arguments can you conceive, or are presented against your perspective? (Here you should also refer to the readings of Aristotle, Kant, or Mill in the corresponding modules)
• How can you overcome the objection against your perspective?
• What is your conclusion about the problem?