Reference no: EM133502935
Case Study: Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Response
INSTRUCTIONS:
Question 1: Is civil commitment of people with mental health symptoms ethical?
Question 2: Explain why or why not, using the NASW code of ethics to discuss what competing ethical principles are in conflict.
Question 3: Should patients with a mental health diagnosis be required by law to take their medications?
Question 4: Why or why not? Use the NASW Code of Ethics to examine ethical issues.