Explain who is correct in given contention

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131389293

Voeller, the managing partner of the Pay-Out Drive-In Theater, signed a contract to sell to Hodge a small parcel of land belonging to the partnership. Except for the last twenty feet, which were necessary for the theater's driveway, the parcel was not used in theater operations. The agreement stated that it was between Hodge and the partnership, with Voeller signing for the partnership. Voeller claims that he told Hodge before signing that a plat plan would have to be approved by the other partners before the sale.

Hodge denies this and sues for specific performance, claiming that Voeller had actual and apparent authority to bind the partnership. The partners argue that Voeller had no such authority and that Hodge knew this. Who is correct? Explain.

Reference no: EM131389293

Questions Cloud

How would you implement the full-adder circuit : How would you implement the full-adder circuit? (Hint: This can be done in two logic modules if the carry-in and carry-out are designed to be active-low.)

Explain whether national biscuit will able to recover value : Explain whether National Biscuit will be able to recover the value of the bread delivered to the Food Center from Stroud and the partnership.

Two goods pure exchange economy : Suppose there is a two-person and two goods pure exchange economy in which both persons have the same, strictly convex utility function and their utilities are increasing in their consumption of both goods . Would an allocation where one person has a..

What characteristics make them stand out : Personal branding is an essential element for marketing yourself and the skills that make you successful. According to Khedher (2014), "Individuals involved in personal branding develop their human capital by investing in continuous learning; enha..

Explain who is correct in given contention : Hodge denies this and sues for specific performance, claiming that Voeller had actual and apparent authority to bind the partnership. The partners argue that Voeller had no such authority and that Hodge knew this. Who is correct? Explain.

Discuss who will prevail and why : Kirit filed an action for specific performance and incidental damages. L. G., S. L., and Rajeshkumar responded that the contract could not lawfully be enforced. Discuss who will prevail and why.

Draw a state diagram that implements this specification : Draw a state diagram that implements this specification using as few states as possible. (Hint: It is possible to implement this machine in six or fewer states.)

List an appropriate traditional training method : Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. As the banking industry struggled to recover from the recent financial crisis and recession (and new regulations) that followed, SunTrust's management deci..

Does the dissolution of the partnership relieve davis : Credit Bureaus of Merced County, as assignee of these three accounts, sued the partnership as well as Shipman and Davis individually. Does the dissolution of the partnership relieve Davis of personal liability for the accounts? Explain.

User Account

All Pages