Explain the relevant law relating to the case

Explain the relevant law relating to the case - agar vs hyde

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131634627 , Length: word count:700

Business law Group Assignment and Presentation -

Learning Outcomes: On successful completion of this assignment, students will be able to:

- Illustrate the principles relating to the law of torts; and

- Explain the principles relating to contract law.

Case Options

1. Blackpool & Flyde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council (1990)

2. Astley v Austrust Limited (2000)

3. Bridgewater v Leahy (1998)

4. Cohen v Cohen (1929)

5. Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987)

6. Waltons Stores (interstate) Ltd. v Maher (1988)

7. Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991)

8. Koompahtoo Local Aborginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007)

9. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail authority of NSW (1982)

10. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1994)

11. Agar v Hyde (2000)

12. Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998)

13. Foran v Wight (1989) HCA 51; (1989)

14. Louth v Diprose (1992)

15. Brisbane City Council v Group Products Pty Ltd (1979)

16. Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Helicopter Charter Pty Ltd (1991)

17. Musumeci v Winadell Pty Ltd (1994)

18. National Australia Bank Ltd v Garcia (1996)

19. Nelson v Nelson (1995)

20. Amoco Australia Pty Ltd v Rocca Bros Motor Engineering Co Pty Ltd (1973)

21. ANZ v Westpac (1988)

22. Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983)

23. Louth v Diprose (1992)

24. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1994)

25. Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002)

26. Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Wellcome Intern'l Pty Ltd (1998)

27. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000)

28. Perre v Apand (1999)

29. Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd (2005)

30. Horne v Queensland (1995)

31. Peter Joseph Haylen v NSW Rugby Union Ltd (2002)

32. Flavel v State of SA (2008)

33. Tame v NSW (2001)

34. Baker v Gilbert (2003)

35. Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987)

36. ACCC v Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi S.R.L. (No 12) (2016)

37. ACCC v Online Dealz Pty Ltd (2016)

38. ACCC v Snowdale Holdings Pty Ltd (2016)

39. ACCC v A.C.N. 099 814 749 Pty Ltd (2016)

40. ACCC v CLA Trading Pty Ltd (2016)

41. ACCC v Chrisco Hampers Australia Limited (No 2) (2016)

42. ACCC v Australian Egg Corporation Limited (2016)

43. ACCC v Bunavit Pty Ltd (2016)

44. ACCC v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 4) (2015)

45. ACCC v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 (2015)

My case is Agar vs Hyde.

Assessment Criteria - Group oral presentation and visual slides

Written Assignment:

Identify the issues of the case
Explain the relevant law relating to the case
Discuss the analysis and legal arguments raised by the parties in case
Summarise the judgement of the case
Referencing.

Reference no: EM131634627

Questions Cloud

What hospitality services do aramark provide : What hospitality services do they provide? How many countries do they serve worldwide? In which country is each company's headquarters located?

Impact of shocks on the economy in that framework : What key simplifying assumption allows us to use the labor market block of a DSGE model to study the immediate impact of shocks.

Analyze the effect of the shock in the labor market : Analyze the effect of the shock in the labor market diagram of a standard DSGE model (with no sticky prices or wages).

What kinds of marketing research could you conduct : What kinds of marketing research could you conduct to determine if this spin-off or expanded product offering may be successful in the marketplace?

Explain the relevant law relating to the case - agar vs hyde : BBAL201 Business law Group Assignment and Presentation. Explain the relevant law relating to the case - Agar vs Hyde

What did raphael intend to convey through his painting : What did Raphael intend to convey through his painting? How was his intended meaning successfully conveyed through the painting?

Discuss about the tfp shock : A permanent TFP shock: Now consider a TFP shock that is permanent. For example, suppose the discovery and application of a new technology makes firms.

What are your concerns and what about your family : XYZ International has just offered you a position in their office in China. How will you respond? What are your concerns? What about your family?

What is the average molecular weight of the mixture : A mixture 0f 50wt% methane, 35wt% ethane, and 15wt% propane. Determine the mole fraction of methane, and what is the average molecular weight of the mixture?

Reviews

len1634627

9/9/2017 3:31:47 AM

Australian student, I just want my part which is of 700 words. My part is Member 2: Arguments raised by parties and Analysis. My case is Agar vs Hyde. Create a group of upto 3 students. The Lecturer will select a case below to find, read, understand, summarise, and present. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2100 Words. (Each member of the group must write 700 words). The presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 9 slides, and three short points per slide. Each member of the group is to present the following part of the IRAC method as listed below (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and Analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome). (Member 1: Issues and Relevant law, Member 2: Arguments raised by parties and Analysis Member 3: Conclusion, Court outcome and Role of relevant court)

len1634627

9/9/2017 3:31:40 AM

Note: Although each group member’s task is clearly allocated and they are required to present their part, but each member is expected to know the full case and may be asked a question from any part of the case. The task is worth a total of 30% of your final marks. At all times: the group was cohesive and courteous; the oral presentations were clear and understandable; the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; the presentation slides were logical and structured; and the oral presentations were interesting and engaging. All the issues are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed.

len1634627

9/9/2017 3:31:32 AM

All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. All aspects of the argument are developed to a great depth of analysis and interpretation through a complex use of four or more relevant references.

Write a Review

Required(*) Message

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

Explain the reason and justification for section of corp act

Research then explain the Reason and Justification for the following section of the Corp Act: SECTION 124, SECTION 129(1) and SECTION 588M(3)

Summarize the ethical challenges involving dna databases

Differentiate the scientific processes for different types of trace evidence. Summarize the ethical challenges involving DNA databases. Analyze the legal issues related to pre-conviction collection of DNA samples.

The juvenile justice system has devised four ways to deal

1) The juvenile justice system has devised four ways to deal with delinquency: the rehabilitation model, the justice model, the balanced and restorative model, and the crime-control model. Which do you think works best? Why? Why is the balanced and r..

Assured A++ Grade

Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!

Submit Assignment

User Account

All Pages