Solution-Explain precisely why the courts ruled

Explain precisely why the courts ruled

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM131110146

Assignment: Contract Consideration and the Employer/Employee Relationship

Instructions

Review the cases below and answer the questions:

• Caley v. Gulfstream Aero. Corp., 428 F.3d 1359 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005)

• Santos v. Gen. Dynamics Aviation Servs. Corp., 9984 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

In both cases the appellate court deferred an employee's right to a jury trial until after completion of the employer's mandatory ADR complaint resolution process even though there was no apparent agreement to this by the employees. In regard to consideration and whether a contract was actually formed, explain precisely why the courts ruled as they did and what might have happened to the employer/employee relationship if the decision had gone the other way in favor of the employees.

Reference no: EM131110146

Questions Cloud

Find approximate expression for electric potential at point : Two equal opposite charges are separated from each other with distance d create an electric dipole moment, Find the electric potential at point A at distance r from the midpoint of two charges

How does this affect the number of times the characters jump : How does this affect the number of times the characters jump?

Is melvin entitled to the fees called for in the contract : Melvin, an attorney licensed in California, was hired by Jane, a resident of Alabama, to represent her in an automobile accident case. Is Melvin entitled to the fees called for in the contract? Why or why not

Is the provision enforceable why or why not : Weniger's employment contract contained the following provision:"Weniger hereby agrees that thoughout the two-year periodcommencing on the termination of his employment hereunder forwhatever reason he will not, Is the provision enforceable? Why or ..

Explain precisely why the courts ruled : In regard to consideration and whether a contract was actually formed, explain precisely why the courts ruled as they did and what might have happened to the employer/employee relationship if the decision had gone the other way in favor of the emp..

Analyze three types of business organizations woods : Analyze three types of business organizations Woods, Johnson and Smith might consider for starting their new restaurant. Be sure to consider at least one limited liability option. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of each type

Discuss how decisions are made in your workgroup : What are the elements that contribute to the group's power base? Is there a perception among employees in your organization that a disparity of power exists between the "powerful group" and other work groups?

Discuss to whom do directors owe their duties : With reference to the quote above, and relevant precedents studied in this course, discuss to whom do directors owe their duties

Discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord : Suppose you are a mediator. In five to seven (5-7) pages discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord and the tenant in which you: Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord

User Account

All Pages

Explain precisely why the courts ruled

Reference no: EM131110146

Reference no: EM131110146

Questions Cloud

Reviews

Write a Review

Business Law and Ethics Questions & Answers

Legal environment of business caselet

Business ethics & legal issues caselet

Questions on business law and ethics

Discuss the doctrine of ratification of pre-incorporation

Discuss the extent of phoenixing activity

Application of law to facts

Question on business law and ethics

Questions on business law

Iidentify the issue raised by the facts

Evaluation of software development

Business value and ethics

Explain what is meant by income by ordinary concepts

Assured A++ Grade

Academics

Major Subjects

Majors

Get In Touch

TERMS & POLICIES

HELP & SUPPORT