Already have an account? Get multiple benefits of using own account!
Login in your account..!
Remember me
Don't have an account? Create your account in less than a minutes,
Forgot password? how can I recover my password now!
Enter right registered email to receive password!
Imagine that you were a justice of the United States Supreme Court at the time and the court has granted a writ of certiorari to hear the case. Examine the facts of the case in detail and provide a written opinion with a detailed 'ratio decidendi' given especially the provisions of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. You may cite, or rely on, decided case law to support or explain your written opinion. Also identify and provide possible arguments that could be made by any dissenting justices against your written opinion.
7-8 pages. double spaced. excluding cover page and reference page.
" On February 15, 2005 in the state of South Carolina, Christopher Pittman fired on his two grandparents with his fathers shotgun as they lay sleeping in their beds, then set their home on fire and fled the scene in his grandparents truck with cash and weapons. Pittman was only 12 years old when he committed these acts. He was charged with premeditated murder and put on trial as an adult. Pittman's defense team argued that young Christopher was unable to know the right from wrong because he was under the influence of Zoloft, an antidepressant. They argued that the fact that Christopher was a child at the time of the murders meant he did not have capacity to plan and execute premeditated murder with the same comprehension of his actions as an adult. The team further argued that the civilized reaction to a juvenile committing such actions would be to offer psychiatric treatment and rehabilitation, not retribution. Prosecutors described Christopher as "diabolical" in his planning of the crime and said they had "no regrets" over seeking adult punishment. The argued that Pittman's troubled youth resulted in "malice, meanness and wickedness" and that he expressed this malice "through a .410 shotgun." Continually, prosecutors pointed to the violent nature of the crime and painted Christopher as an individual possessed by incomprehensible wickedness and that those were grounds for convicting the young defendant of premeditated murder as an adult. In South Carolina, there is no minimum age for a child to be tried as an adult in a murder case and the 12-member jury convicted Christopher Pittman of premeditated murder and sented him to 30 years in prison, the maximum sentence. In South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Pittman's appeal and affirmed the 30-year conviction by a vote of 4-1."
write a 400 word review of the article. your review should discuss how the sox act may affect ethical decision making
magine that you are an attorney specializing in juvenile justice cases. you receive a phone call from mrs. i whose
Note: The companies mentioned herein are merely hypothetical organizations with characteristics developed to enable students to respond to the assignment. You may create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this..
Explain Making Entrepreneurial Decisions and How about a decision you are making now or a decision you will make in the future
Explain Environmental Laws vs Economic Freedom and What is your perspective regarding environmental restrictions and economic freedom
1.nbspis scene security an important issue at all fires?if so why?2.what are some methods to document a fire
After a few years, G & M Constructions continues to grow strongly and Gino wishes to spend less time on the worksites. His children, particularly Margaret, are unhappy with many of Gino's managerial decisions and they want him to retire.
a police officers job is about ensuring the protection of basic moral rights including the right to life liberty
Explain whether the terms of the agreement are enforceable and if yes, to what extent. Apply case law and legislations to identify the remedies available to Born-Free in the event that the courts held that there was a breach by Benny. Demonstrat..
Explain Should Managers Consider Race in the Hiring Equation and The issue of diversity is a major topic for government suppliers that have to supply census data about their workforce relative to the race of candidates that they hire for opportunit..
as a paralegal in a law office write a paralegal that your office is opposing in a legal case that requests response to
Henry immediately contacted Mr. Field to nullify the order. Mr. Field said that he expected them to honour the agreement. Explain the legal position of all of the parties.
Get guaranteed satisfaction & time on delivery in every assignment order you paid with us! We ensure premium quality solution document along with free turntin report!
whatsapp: +1-415-670-9521
Phone: +1-415-670-9521
Email: [email protected]
All rights reserved! Copyrights ©2019-2020 ExpertsMind IT Educational Pvt Ltd