Discuss with james whether it was legitimate to charge

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM133375773

Case Study: James was charged with a number of offences of dishonesty. When he was charged with three further offences of dishonesty he was refused bail. A draft indictment was prepared which contained a number of new counts. The prosecutor applied to the magistrates' court for the new counts to be put to the applicant, for the old charges to be discharged and for the applicant to be remanded in custody. He also asked the court to note that, since there were new charges, there were correspondingly new custody time limits. James applied for judicial review on the ground that the so-called new charges were simply the old charges with amendments which amounted to changes of detail only. James came to you for advice.

Questions:

Discuss with James whether it was legitimate to charge as a single information one

activity even if that activity involves more than one act.

Reference no: EM133375773

Questions Cloud

Procedures associated with defensive technologies : Explain the concepts and procedures associated with defensive technologies and explain why the concepts and procedures are important to an organization.

Discussed numerous social and critical theories of law : Wacks discussed numerous social and critical theories of law. Which of these theories made the most sense to you? Why? Explain.

Explain importance of audit management in organization : Explain the importance of audit management in an organization and discuss the role of internal audit and its effects on an organization

Do we need a global convention for idps : Is humanitarian assistance for IDPs a matter of discretion or a state duty under international law? Do we need a global convention for IDPs?

Discuss with james whether it was legitimate to charge : Discuss with James whether it was legitimate to charge as a single information one activity even if that activity involves more than one act.

Do each of the three subtopics contribute to establishing : Do each of the three subtopics contribute to establishing why your stance is the most rational one in the argument?

Discuss the constitutional implications of the prism mass : Discuss the Constitutional implications of the PRISM mass surveillance program. What must be done to prevent pre-Watergate abuses by the government

What is the meaning and effect of beyond reasonable doubt : Why do we say that criminal liability must be proven by the prosecution 'beyond reasonable doubt'? What is the meaning and effect of 'beyond reasonable doubt'?

How it may be the cause of a reduction in victims bringing : how it may be the cause of a reduction in victims bringing forward concerns. What suggestions, either legislative, or through employer policy do you have

User Account

All Pages