Reference no: EM134023949

Question

One of the hospitals of a major multi-unit corporation has a nationally reputable referral Burn Care Program in Augusta, Georgia. The program was established in 1978 with an expansion of O.R. facilities and converting one of the nursing units into a burn care unit with 20 beds. By 1991 the unit was expanded to a 40-bed unit by including an adjacent unit. The program has been highly successful and financially rewarding for the hospital until recently when the managed care contracts have significantly reduced the reimbursement levels. Augusta has experienced a nursing shortage during the last three decades, into the 1990s. The burn care program has always suffered from the nurse staffing problems. To recruit nurses, the hospital offered a Baylor Plan for scheduling nurses on the burn care unit in 1982. The plan consisted of nurses working 12-hour shifts on weekends, thus working 24 hours per weekend and getting paid for 36 hours (because of overtime policy) with full-time benefits. Therefore the nurses who worked on weekends did not work on weekdays. During the week, nurses worked 12-hour shifts for five days (Monday-Friday), thus working 60 hours and getting paid for 70 hours (because of overtime policy) with full-time benefits. Those nurses who worked on weekdays worked for five continuous days and were off the next nine days (two weekends and the following week). This scheduling basically consisted of three groups of nurses. One group worked the first week of a two-week pay period, the second group worked on the weekends, and the third group worked the second week of the pay period. This scheduling allowed nurses to have more leisure time or time for a second job, which many nurses were doing through agency nursing. This plan was proposed by the nurses and was adopted in May 1982 by the administration for all intensive and critical care units including Burn Care, Coronary Care, and Intensive Care. Other medical, surgical and pediatric units are a using regular eight-hour scheduling system with shift rotation and weekend rotations. Most other hospitals in the community have also adopted similar Baylor Plans during the 1980s for nurses in ICUs and CCUs in order to improve recruitment of nurses. The hospital's budgeted nurse-staffing standard in 1996 was 22 hours per patient per day (HPPD). The staff nurses on the unit, however, generally complained that the staffing levels were not sufficient to provide quality care to the burn patients. In December 1996, the hospital Burn-Care Unit 2 implemented Medicus patient acuity system for staffing and adopted 3.5 hours of direct care per acuity point as its worked nurse-staffing standard. In May 1993 Mr. Adams, the regional vice-president of the corporation and an accountant by training, wrote a letter to Mr. Warden, the CEO, that he should discontinue the Baylor Plan as it was costing about $800,000 more in nursing payroll. The CEO discussed the memo with Mrs. Turner, the vice-president of nursing for the hospital. Within a few days the VP for nursing discussed the situation with all of the nursing directors. The next day, the head nurse of the burn care unit came to see the VP for nursing and informed her that the morale of the nurses was going down very fast and many were considering resignation. Several days later, Dr. Smith, the physician in charge of the burn care program, came to see Mr. Warden and informed him of a union activity and that some of the nurses were planning to go on strike. (The hospital nurses are not unionized, but there is a history of a nurses strike in 1979, which was settled in favor of nurses' demand for higher wages and benefits.) Mrs. Turner was asked by Mr. Warden to contact Ms. Jones, the VP for nursing at the corporate office to provide assistance in the situation. Ms. Jones and Mr. Johnson, the director of Management Engineering, visited the hospital. After several weeks of communications between the corporate office, regional office and the hospital, the president of the hospital division of the corporation decided that the matter should be solved at the local level. The hospital, however was asked to reduce the operating expenses for the burn care patients. It was pointed out that burn care will no longer be a profitable product line under the managed care contracts. The hospital was given a goal of reducing operating expenses by $500,000 for the burn care unit. The corporation has hired you to assist Mr. Warden in solving this problem. The corporation has a perfect Management Information System (Ha! Ha!). I am providing you with the necessary data to solve the problems. Your job is to reduce operating expenses by $500,000 without reducing the quality of care or services to patients. You must also avert the nurses' strike and maintain their long-term job satisfaction. You can implement any change, use any strategy to reduce your expenses. If your strategy involves capital expenditure, then it must be paid for with interest within three years by the additional savings in operating expenses.

1. Develop a method of estimating the annual labor cost of operating the unit (use guideline provided with the case);

2. Determine alternative strategies for reducing labor expenses;

3. Estimate potential cost savings from each strategy at various levels of implementation

4. Choose your strategies and provide your implementation plan;

5. Make your Group report to the CEO of the hospital with a two-page executive summary and a full report not to exceed 15 pages double-spaced, excluding appendices, charts and tables.