No Task Weak /Poor (< 50%) Adequate/ Satisfactor y (50- 59)% Good (Acceptabl e) (60- 69)% Very good quality (70-79)% Excellent (80 – 89) % Outstandi ng ( ? 90%) Marks 1 Report structure include abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, references, appendix (if any) 10 2 Summary 10 3 Introduction 10 4 Methods of designing (steps) 10 5 Calculations 20 6 Results & Discussion 20 7 Conclusions & recommendations 10 8 References 10 Total Marks 100 Plagiarism Late Submission Final Marks (out of 20%)

Weak /Poor (all learning outcomes not adequately met) Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. and/or Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and professional development planning Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures and/or No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence

Adequate/ Satisfactory Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence

Good (Acceptable) Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence

Very Good Quality Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence

Excellent Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a wide range of educational literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence

Outstanding Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent cross-referencing and links to supporting evidence

Rules & Regulations • If any content or diagram of the report body is found to be copied from the other students then marks will be deducted from both reports. • The purpose of the report is to do some research work so you can consult books in Library or use internet or computer magazines or any other source. Marking Rubrics: Classification And Range to be given as per requirement Reflection and critical analysis. Knowledge and Understanding/ Application of Theory Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling

DELIVERABLE: The report should not exceed 12 pages, starts from the abstract to the appendix (if any). GUIDELINES: Follow the guidelines mentioned below during writing your report: ? The report should have a Title Page. Title Page should contain the following information. ? College name and logo ? Title ? Module name and Code ? Student name ? Student ID ? Use page numbers ? Use your own words on writing, Times New Roman font size 12 ? Heading should be with Font Size 12, Bold ? Copy and paste from the Internet sources is strictly not acceptable and will be treated as a plagiarism and will be dealt with as per polices given below.

Appendices (extra; no marks are assigned) Provides detailed information (raw data, calculations, etc) that might interest only a few readers, especially those who must verify t h e validity of your designing & results. ? The report is logical and readable without having to refer to the appendices. ? The report identifies what material appears in Appendices. Fails to refer to appendices in the text of the report. Fails to clearly label and identify appendix material. General Hints: ? Check all table and figures for accuracy and completeness. ? Check all equations and units of measure. ? Make sure conclusions and recommendations appear in order of importance. ? Avoid strings of long sentences. ? Make sure adjectives and adverbs relate closely to what the data actually show.

References [10 Marks] ? Provide at least 10 references. ? Write the references according to the Harvard referencing system. ? Cite references inside the report. ? Different sources such as journals, books, proceedings, etc. ? Citation in text and references list as well ? Following Harvard References Format ? Minimum 10 references Citation from one source No citation in text Not follow Harvard References format Provided less than 10 references

Conclusions and Recommendations (Maximum half page) [10 Marks] ? Lists the conclusions reached as a result of this study. ? Restates any limitations, assumptions or violations of assumptions that might qualify the conclusions. ? List conclusions and recommendations in order of importance. ? Links conclusions and recommendations to the information in previous sections of this report. ? Cautions the reader about limitations and uncertainties Offers a conclusion or recommendation that has no basis in the results of the experiment. Fails to caution the reader about any limitations to or uncertainties in the conclusions

? Interpret the results in light of what you expected based on published information. ? Identifies the significant sources of error and assesses the reliability of your results. ? Comments on any abnormalities in the procedure that might affect results. ? Identifies and explains any unusual or surprising results. ? Presents all analytical results. ? Compares your results with published results, focusing on the same relationships. ? Summarizes the degree to which the experiment achieved its goals. ? States results in clear language and in past tense. The conclusions exaggerate what the results would support. Fails to explain or interpret the significance of errors. Fails to present data in formats that reveal critical relationships (trends, cause/effect, etc.) Fails to identify units of measurement. Fails to give a precise engineering explanation for any failure to obtain results. Fails to summarize

Methods of designing (steps) [10 Mark] ? Provides a s e q u e n t i a l s t e p s o f d e s i g n i n g t h e d r a i n a g e s y s t e m . ? Clearly understand the concepts and methods of designing. ? Gives full description about all the parameters/coefficients selected. ? Critically analyses the designing. ? Identifies all the methods employed ? Provides detailed description and importance with important steps. ? Provides more detail if the method is novel or unfamiliar. Fails to use t h e c o n c e p t s a n d i m p o r t a n t m e t h o d s employed. Fails to use proper values of coefficients. Calculations [20 Marks] ? Make calculations with all necessary steps. ? Give the derivation of optimum section. ? Gives comprehensive design of the section. ? Take care of units. ? Properly does the work with proper steps. ? Makes all necessary calculations with units. ? Gives good design of section. ? Omit steps. Omit writing units of the values. Poor design of section.

Introduction (Maximum half pages) [10 Marks] ? Summarize general introduction of the topic. ? Explain in detail o b j e c t i v e s a n d i m p o r t a n c e of study. ? Explain the necessity of the UDD. ? Describe uses of urban drainage system with examples and detailed description. ? Include some case studies. ? Usually consists of 0 . 5 - 1.5 pages. ? Gives clear understanding about the topic. ? Clearly explains the objectives. Fails to clearly define the problem and the relevance of the study.

Summary (Maximum Half Page) [10 Marks] ? Consists of not more ? Summarizes the entire study within word limits. ? Employs concise statements. ? Contains specific information. Omits critical findings. than 150- 250 words. Refers reader to figures or ? State the objectives. ? Critically describes the tables in the report. Relies on vague language methods and materials employed, especially if they are novel or unfamiliar. ? Explain cocisely important results and conclusions. Introduction

I want this assignment. Please cross check the whole assignment if you can or not. Check if any software is required to do or not... make sure u can do the calculations etc... etc... Report Component and Specifications Characteristics of Success General Appearance of the report (Format, Title Page, etc.) ? General Appearances such ? Same font size & type throughout the report. ? Include all the mentioned headings (titles) in the report. as border line margins, font size & type etc. ? All the mentioned titles not more not less. ? Standard cover page Characteristics of Weakness [10 Marks] Omits proper mentioned headings. Different font size & type.