Reference no: EM133938842

Question

In this scenario, Connor feels he must choose worker safety or meeting a production deadline. His immediate supervisor advocates cutting safety corners and skipping breaks in favor of a higher daily output. Connor knows this compromises worker safety, and workers are following orders because they fear losing their jobs. This case illustrates the difficulties faced by middle managers who value ethics.

After refusing to let his workers cut safety corners and work through breaks, Connor begins hearing rumors of injuries on other shifts. The situation deepens when his immediate supervisor informs Connor that Connor's shift is not performing up to expectations. Lay-offs of underachieving workers from his shift will start soon if they do not begin producing up to speed. Connor recognizes this as a veiled threat but refuses to compromise his workers' safety. He decides he will approach the general manager about the situation. He knows she has the power to fire him, but he does not want to be a part of putting workers in harm's way. Connor believes that the benefits of increased production do not outweigh the risks of potential injury. He feels like this situation will eventually backfire.

1. Describe Conners moral dilemma. Where is his moral compass pointed? Where is the corporate moral compass pointed? Elaborate on the concepts which address this discrepancy.

2. In AlumaArc's reasoning, the benefits of increasing production outweigh the risks of potential injuries. How could this approach potentially backfire?

3. How might Conner be covered from a legal standpoint if he chose to become a whistleblower? Provide research to support your explanation.

4. If you were Conner, what would you do? Why?