Reference no: EM13210964

1) Was the dam itself of sound design and a product of quality construction?
2) Compose a list here of the geological terms that you encounter in this reading that you could not define and explain in a test situation.
3) How much time elapsed between completion of the dam and the occurrence of the devastating slide detailed in this paper?
4) Were the designers aware that this valley was landslide-prone before they built the dam? What feature of Fig. 1 suggests an answer?
5) Read the description of the Malm Formation under "The geologic setting". List all words here that you are certain are significant in conveying to the reader a problem with respect to slope stability.
6) Examine Fig. 4. Note the wide U-shaped profile of the upper (outer) portion of the valley as opposed to the steep V-shaped profile of the lower (inner) portion of the valley. Can you explain why this form exists? Is the form meaningful in terms of the dam?
7) Was the occurrence of the slide a complete surprise or was there some forewarning? If it was not a surprise, list the times and types of forewarning that were available.
8) A slide occurred in 1960 near the dam. Why didn't this slide cause a disaster? In what way might this slide have instilled a false sense of security into the minds of engineers who managed the reservoir?
9) Use graph (or engineering) paper or the computer, make a graph of rate of creep in
cm/day (y-axis) vs. time (x-axis) given on page 36. Mathematically, what type of
function is described by this graph? If you wish to modify your answer to "7" above, do
so here.
10) If you ignore the labels and the caption of Fig. 5 and simply look at the geological formations, is there anything that tells you that this valley constitutes a hazardous landslide-prone site?
11) Does excellence in engineering design guarantee final success of a project? If not, what additional resource(s) are needed?
12) If a liability suit evolved from this failure, who would be liable?