Compare and contrast the roles of the judge and jury

Assignment Help Business Law and Ethics

Reference no: EM13773732

Assignment: Your State v. Mark

Mark Davis has been charged with Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) for reckless driving, speeding, four counts of felony assault, and one count of involuntary manslaughter as the result of a crash that occurred on a night out with his friends. Mark has been out on bail and pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned. The Judge set a date for Mark's trial and his defense team has been working to collect information about the technology used by the Highway Patrol to reconstruct the crash.

District Attorney O'Malley offered Mark a plea bargain, but Mark chose to take his chances at trial. Mark's attorney, Mr. Chen Long, advised Mark that accepting the plea offer was completely up to Mark, although Mr. Long advised against accepting it because the defense planned to highlight mistakes made by law enforcement during the investigation that could create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

The trial begins and during the voir dire of potential jurors, several individuals are excused because they have previous knowledge of Mark's case from the media. Two individuals stated that they could not be impartial because they had loved ones killed in alcohol related crashes as well. Eventually, two men and ten women were seated in Mark's trial.

District Attorney O'Malley presented the State's case clearly and concisely depicting a night on the town full of heavy drinking, which ultimately resulted in Mark's actions causing the death of one individual and injuring four others. Highway Patrolman Green explained to the jury that he immediately suspected alcohol when he arrived on scene because Mark appeared to be intoxicated when they spoke. Following the Judge ruling that it was admissible and not prejudicial, Sergeant Rodney Monroe, from the Highway Patrol Reconstruction Team presented their reconstruction complete with a high-tech computer animated reenactment of the crash. During the cross examination, Defense Attorney Long challenged the reconstruction because the Defense Crash Reconstruction Expert had discovered errors in the mathematical calculations for vehicle speed. The jury appeared to have liked the reconstruction very much regardless of the errors highlighted by the defense.

Mark was convicted of DWI, four counts of felony assault, and one count of involuntary manslaughter; however, he was acquitted of reckless driving and speeding. The Jury said they could not convict Mark of those offenses because of the mistakes made by law enforcement officers during the investigation.

Because Mark pleads not guilty, but was convicted during trial and had two prior DWI offenses, he was sentenced to ten years in the State Prison. Defense Attorney Long immediately notified the court of an impending appeal that would be filed by the defendant. In a report, using external sources to support your claims, answer the following:

Compare and contrast the roles of the Judge, Jury, District Attorney (Prosecutor), and Defense Attorney. What are their primary functions and purposes in the courtroom Workgroup?
Discuss the rights of the defendant in your state during the trial phase of the criminal justice process.
Discuss the rights of the victims and/or their families in your state during the pre-trial and trial phase of the criminal justice process. Would it be unusual for the family of a deceased victim to become angered by a slow criminal justice process or one where they are not permitted by law to be given information about the facts or evidence in the case by the District Attorney's Office before the trial?
Compare and contrast plea-bargaining versus going to trial. Historically, opponents to plea bargains have claimed that they are used to alleviate heavy workloads of prosecutors (district attorneys). Prosecutors argue that plea-bargaining is a necessary part of the criminal justice process for several reasons. Where is the future of the criminal justice process headed in this regard?
Analyze how the Highway Patrol's computer animated reenactment might have related to the Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) effect in the courtroom.

Reference no: EM13773732

Questions Cloud

Discuss the market entry strategies : Discuss the market entry strategies that IKEA adopt in China and Japan respectively - what are the opportunities and challenges for IKEA.

What role did the rule of joint and several liability play : What was the constitutional basis of the historic multistate challenge to the Affordable Care Act that was granted certiorari by the Supreme Court? What role did the rule of Joint and Several Liability play

Assignment on the product offering : Perform a product launch as a team of Marketing Management for a sample plan. You will complete parts of the assignment in the coming weeks;

How to do revising your paper organization and cohesion : How to do Revising Your Paper: Organization and Cohesion? how to use in essay Using a Consistent Style and Tone? How we Editing Your Paper?

Compare and contrast the roles of the judge and jury : Compare and contrast the roles of the Judge, Jury, District Attorney (Prosecutor), and Defense Attorney. What are their primary functions and purposes in the courtroom Workgroup

Office of surface mining reclamation and enforcement : Which of the following is NOT generally identified as biomass fuel?

Classic airlines marketing solution : Use a problem-solving model to solve Classic Airline's marketing problem located on your student web page. It is not required but you may use the nine-step model. You must identify and define the problem, and apply a robust problem-solving process..

Determine the specific heat for different materials and comp : Measurements of Specific Heat and Latent Heat of Fusion Description: determine the specific heat for different materials and compare with the known values: Materials: Kitchen scales or spring scales Styrofoam cups Thermometer -Specific heat set Hint:..

Topic expressed by justices of the supreme court : Evaluate a minimum of four perspectives on this topic expressed by justices of the Supreme Court, leaders in other branches of government, and commentators in both the academic and popular media. Your evaluation should consider perspectives on the fo..

User Account

All Pages