Reference no: EM13872366
This study requires you to compile a sample data in the UK for:
(1) Per capita expenditure a specific food or food group (FX)
(2) Unemployment Rates for a period of 12 years (UR)
You will be told your years and food choices. You must then assemble the data,
Sources: Data can be obtained via ONS for example in the Annual Abstract of Statistics.
The specific data for FX can be found on a spreadsheet in this page
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/family-food-datasets
which will be placed in Blackboard.
1. Present your data in a table showing the names of the variables. Make sure the full definitions and sources of each variable are given.
2. The first equation to be estimated is :
FX i = b0 + b1 URi +ui
Where u is a disturbance term and the i subscript represents year.
Answer these questions:
(i) In terms of economic theory what sign would you expect to find for the coefficients in the regression equation ?
(ii) Explain why we are using per capita data for food rather than the total value as the dependent variable?
(iii) Why is there a constant term in the equation with no variable attached?
(iv) Why do these types of equations have a ‘u' term ?
3. Estimate equation (1) by OLS and present the results in a suitable table
(i) Comment on the result for the coefficient on the UR variable.
(ii) Comment on the R squared statistic.
(iii) Is the estimated value of b0 positive or negative? Does it matter for the reliability of your estimates for b1 whether b0 is positive or negative?
(iv) Examine the residuals of your estimated equation to determine whether any of your years might be considered an outlier in the regression.
(v) Calculate the elasticity of FX with respect to UR at the sample means and comment on it?
4. You are now required to estimate the following form of the model using OLS:
FX i = b0 + b1 URi + b2 UR i 2 +ui
where u is a classical disturbance term.
Carry out the following hypothesis tests
(i) b0=0 against the two sided alternative at the 10% level for both equations
(ii) b1=0 against the two sided alternative at the 5 % level for both equations
(iii) b1=b2=0 against the one sided alternative at the 5% level for the second equation
(iv) Establish whether your second equation has one of the following shapes:
(a) U-shaped
(b) Inverted U-shape
(c) Non-linear upward sloping
(d) Non-linear downward sloping
(e) Linear upward sloping
(f) Linear downward sloping
(g) None of the above
5. Having estimated both equations, compare their results and consider whether equation 2 is an improvement over equation 1.
6. Economists would think that the model you have estimated so far is not satisfactory in terms of the independent variables. You should now change this model by introducing up to a maximum of two additional variables. Explain why these variables have been chosen and give full sources and definitions for them. Present and interpret the regression results for this new model.
7. You should now write a short report of 450-600 words. This should briefly summarize your findings- marks will be given for further exploration of your model involving the provision of new estimates and suggestions for improvement of the model you have estimated.