Part 4 – Cloud Proposal Writing /10 Very well-articulated and thorough proposal for using cloud computing infrastructure, including prices. Considers highly relevant literature and references according to APA style. Well-articulated and thorough proposal for using cloud computing infrastructure, including prices. Considers relevant literature and references according to APA style. Well-articulated proposal for using cloud computing infrastructure, including prices. Considers literature and references according to APA style. Inconsistently or marginal articulation. Considers limited or irrelevant literature. Poorly articulated proposal. Fails to consider reasonable literature. Negligible attempt or not done. Analysis /10 Highly considered and accurate analysis and judgement of the public cloud, private cloud and status quo. Considered and accurate analysis and judgement of the public cloud, private cloud and status quo. Reasonable analysis and judgement of the public cloud, private cloud and status quo. Analysis and judgement have significant issues. Analysis and judgement are flawed and/or simplistic. Negligible attempt or not done.

Weighted Decision Matrix and Budget /15 1. The WDM has been formatted as per the practical example 2. Clear and concise justifications for priorities and attributes given in the matrix. 3. Budget is professional, detailed, accurate, and visually appealing As per “exemplary”, but some minor lapses. The WDM has been formatted as per the practical example and there are basic justifications for priorities and attributes given in the matrix. Budget is accurate, and visually appealing Some significant problems with the formatting of the WDM, justifications, or budget. The WDM and budget have been attempted but have many problems (e.g. not formatted correctly, justifications and criteria are illogical, budget is inaccurate, etc). Negligible attempt or not done.

Document /10 1. Document is neat and professional 2. Sections are named appropriately 3. Image (not drawing object) placed in document. 4. All device interfaces defined Most of the spreadsheet criteria are satisfactory (See criteria 1-4 under "exemplary") but some minor issues. Over half of the spreadsheet criteria are satisfactory (See criteria 1-4 under "exemplary") Under half of the spreadsheet criteria are satisfactory (See criteria 1-4 under "exemplary") Part 3 - Procurement Executive summary, purpose and scope /10 Extremely well-articulated and: 1. Clear description of the project’s purpose 2. Clear description of the project goals 3. Clear description of the project scope Well-articulated and: 1. Clear description of the project’s purpose 2. Clear description of the project goals 3. Clear description of the project scope Reasonably articulated and: 4. Clear description of the project’s purpose 5. Clear description of the project goals 6. Clear description of the project scope Poorly articulated or unclear, but contains the main elements (See criteria 1-3 under “exemplary”)

Part 2 Subnetting Scheme /25 1. Subnetting done in the most efficient manner with correctly sized subnets (incl. correct subnet masks) and the following are available as per the assignment guide: 2. Subnet address 3. Subnet mask (in slash format) 4. First useable address 5. Last useable address 6. Broadcast address 1. Subnetting done in the most efficient manner with correctly sized subnets (incl. correct subnet masks) and most of the following are correct as per the assignment guide: 2. Subnet address 3. Subnet mask (in slash format) 4. First useable address 5. Last useable address 6. Broadcast address 1. Subnetting done with correctly sized subnets (incl. correct subnet masks) and most of the following are correct as per the assignment guide: 2. Subnet address 3. Subnet mask (in slash format) 4. First useable address 5. Last useable address 6. Broadcast address

Satisfactory 60% Limited 40% Very Limited 20% Absent 0% 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and over half of the following are satisfactory: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and over half of the following are unsatisfactory: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level Many problems (e.g. not done in Visio, inconsistent formatting, diagram does not align to subnetting scheme, etc). Negligible attempt or not done.

Satisfactory 60% Limited 40% Very Limited 20% Absent 0% 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and over half of the following are satisfactory: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and over half of the following are unsatisfactory: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level Many problems (e.g. not done in Visio, inconsistent formatting, diagram does not align to subnetting scheme, etc). Negligible attempt or not done.

Assignment Marking Scheme Ensure that you follow the processes and guidelines taught in class to produce high quality work. This assessment rubric provides you with the characteristics of exemplary, good, satisfactory, and unacceptable work in relation to task criteria. The total marks are out of 100. Criteria Exemplary 100% Good 80% Part 1 Topology Design Diagram appearance /10 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and the diagram is: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level 1. Created in MS Visio using Cisco icon set, and most of the following are satisfactory: 2. Neat and Professional 3. All lines at set angles (multiples of 30, 45, 90 degrees) 4. Lines do not end short 5. Lines do not appear over the top of devices 6. Lines align if on same level

Introduction This case study has been divided into four components. You are to design a network, research and source appropriate devices justifying choices (feasibility, efficiency, etc.), subnet the network, and assign IP addresses to the appropriate devices. Note: This is not a group project. Each student must individually complete all parts of their submission. Students must start with a new document and they must not have another person’s file in their possession at any time. Students may discuss the task with each other, but each student must write their assignment independently and not show their work to other students.