there, in this assignment the PART A is only need to be done not PART B and the two companies should be Commonwealth Bank Australia and Danske Bank. Also, regarding 2 assigment in past were not up to the mark and i was not satisfied with the feedback given to the assignment, therefore this time please look after this assignment very carefully thank you. hoping best from u this time.

Script presentation – 25 marks 1. Script dialogue was presented as a role play, which went beyond simply reading the script. The script dialogue was delivered in an interesting and engaging way, which challenged the audience to engage thoughtfully with the issues presented. 10 2. The delivery of the dialogue between the stakeholders reflected a suitable style and tone for the context of the scenes being presented, with the appropriate use of interpersonal communication, expression and non-verbal communication, to present realistic workplace relationships and communications. 5 3. All group members were included and provided meaningful contributions to the role play. All performers could be easily seen and heard by the audience and were able to respond effectively to questions from the audience. 5 4. Effective use of time, props and creativity. 5 Total – Role play presentation /25 TOTAL – Assessment 2 Part B /100 Comments:

Script for role play – 50 marks 1. Clearly identifies and addresses the ethical dilemma/values conflict raised in the scenario. 10 2. Identifies reasons and rationalizations that might be used to justify the questionable business action/practice/issue at the center of the ethical dilemma. 10 3. The central character is able to effectively give voice to their values by effectively using GVV ‘levers’ to present powerful and persuasive responses to counter the reasons and rationalizations. 10 4. Demonstrates the most appropriate and most effective use of GVV’s ‘say what, to whom, when and how’ approach. i.e. speaks to the appropriate stakeholders, using a respectful and considered strategic approach, and provides thoughtful (and helpful) suggestions etc. 10 5. Achieves a realistic outcome that demonstrates a nuanced understanding of interpersonal and professional communication and relationships, which avoids false dichotomies, ultimatums, stand-offs and contrived resolutions. 10 Total for Script /50

Development of scenario – 25 marks 1. Provides the reader with a clear description of the workplace, the main characters and stakeholders, the key facts and background information relevant to the ethical dilemma. 10 2. Clearly identifies the ethical dilemma and values conflict that has emerged for the central character. 5 3. Clearly identifies the stakeholders and discusses what is at stake for them. 5 4. Written as a narrative (similar in style to the Babson scenarios), which uses clear English expression, spelling and grammar. 5

Qvi - Briefly reflect on your groups’ discussions of these companies. In what ways did the ideas presented by your group confirm your own conclusions or present another perspective to you? Responses should: • Reflect on the group discussions about the social reporting of the two companies selected • Identify key points of agreement and disagreement with other group members • Discuss how the different perspectives provided by group members contributed to your own consideration of the performance of these companies 15% Presentation (expression, structure, referencing, organisation, word count – not including cover sheet and references etc.) 10% Total 100%

Qiv- Assess the apparent quality of the social accounting approach utilized by each company according to Zadek et al.’s (1997) criteria. Responses should: • Provide some brief commentary on the extent to which each of the companies does or does not meet the eight criteria identified by Zadek et al (1997) as the key principles of quality of social reporting, as outlined on P. 216 (Crane & Matten, 2010). • Identify which key principles are met (and how they are met) by each company’s social reporting • Identify which principles have not been met 15% Qv - Discuss the extent to which the social reports reflect the values of your selected companies. Responses should: • Identify each company’s values (including their Mission Statement, Values, Business Principles etc.) as stated on their websites, reports or in other company documentation • Critically analyse each company’s social reports in terms of the extent to which their stated values align (or do not align) with their approaches to social responsibility and sustainability (based on the evidence in the reports) 15%

Qii - What differences are evident between the two companies in terms of the range of social, environmental and economic issues dealt with in their reports and the depth of coverage on specific issues? Responses should: • compare the style, content and presentation of the social reports provided by each company • critically analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches to social reporting evident in the reports • comment on the range of issues covered and the depth of the coverage 15% Qiii - Discuss which of the Sustainable Development Goals you believe are most relevant to these companies, their industries and the countries in which they operate. Discuss the extent to which these SDGs were addressed, explicitly or implicitly, in the CSR/Sustainability reports of your companies: • Demonstrate critical thinking and analysis to identify key SDGs and explain why these are particularly relevant to each company • Describe the extent to which these SDGs have been addressed (explicitly or implicitly) and the effectiveness of this reporting 15%

Marking Guide Name Responses to questions % Grade Qi - describe the two companies that have been researched. Responses should: • clearly identify and describe the two companies being researched • clearly describe the industries and countries in which these companies operate • Clearly describe any social reporting/performance issues that may be relevant for these companies. 15%

This task requires you to work both individually and as part of a group to consider the Corporate Social Responsibility performance and stated values of two similar organisations and apply the Giving Voice to Values framework. There are two parts to this task: ? Part A – 25% Business Values Assessment Report ? Part B – 20% Application of the GVV framework – scenario development, script development and online presentation NOTE all group members must participate in Part A and Part B Please see below for the details of these Task Requirements.