Reference no: EM132289844
Part 1
The HCAHPS data for the Emergency Department would indicate there are areas where the care and services are not up to par, as compared to state or national standards.
Using Kotter's work as described in Chapter 16 of your text, and other change models from the reading, write a 3- to 4-page (excluding title page and references) analysis of the performance data for the Emergency Department, comparing the medical care and services to state and/or national standards. Provide recommendations for strategies to improve the Emergency Department substandard performance indicators.
Resources
Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press
Adams, L. Y., &Maykut, C. A. (2015). Bullying: The antithesis of caring acknowledging the dark side of the nursing profession. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 8(3), 765-773.
Albrecht, R. M. (2015). Patient safety: The what, how, and when. The American Journal of Surgery, 210(6), 978-982.
Bellack, J. P., & Thibault, G. E. (2016). Creating a continuously learning health system through technology: A call to action. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(1), 3-5.
Part 2 a ( separate from part b DO NOT MIX THEM)
Organizations and communities that attain the Triple Aim will have healthier populations, in part because of new designs that better identify problems and solutions further upstream and outside of acute health care. Patients can expect less complex and much more coordinated care and the burden of illness will decrease.
Importantly, stabilizing or reducing the per capita cost of care for populations will give businesses the opportunity to be more competitive, lessen the pressure on publicly funded health care budgets, and provide communities with more flexibility to invest in activities, such as schools and the lived environment, that increase the vitality and economic wellbeing of their inhabitants.
-Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2016b)
This week, you will explain why you think the Triple Aim program is successful and, based on the initiatives, recommend two strategies you would take to improve implementation of health care quality initiatives within your organization or a health care organization in which you are familiar.
To prepare:
Review the IHI White Paper in this week's Learning Resources titled A Guide to Measuring the Triple Aim: Population Health Experience of Care, and Per Capita Cost.
Note: For this Discussion you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleague's postings.
Begin by clicking on the "Post to Discussion" link and then select "Create Thread" to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking Submit!
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Explain why you think the Triple Aim programs have been successful.Based on the success of the Triple Aim initiatives, recommend two strategies you would take to improve implementation of health care quality initiatives within your organization (or an organization you are familiar with).
Describe challenges/opportunities you may encounter in doing so.
Support your response by identifying and explaining key points and/or examples presented in the Learning Resources.
Refrences
Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Block, D. J. (2014). Revisiting the Triple Aim-Are we any closer to integrated health care? Physician Executive, 40(1), 40-43.
Seow, H. Y., & Sibley, L. M. (2014). Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: A population-based cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 363.
Part 2 b
This week the Final Project is designed to give you an opportunity to analyze a quality improvement program. You will analyze data related to benchmarks and national standards and suggest two goals for initiatives that address any deficiencies/opportunities in quality. Anticipated outcomes will also be identified, and appropriate time frames to re-evaluate data and provide a new analysis will be addressed.
To prepare:
Read the case study Patient Safety at Grand River Hospital & St. Mary's General Hospital in your Learning Resources.
Conduct an analysis of the case and write a 10- to 12-page (excluding title page and references) report including:
• Data analysis against benchmarks and national standards
• Observations about where quality improvements are needed
• Goals for initiatives that address those deficiencies/opportunities in quality
• Outcomes that are anticipated in order to accomplish the initiatives
• Appropriate time frames to re-evaluate data and provide a new analysis. Justify your response
Refrences
Quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Block, D. J. (2014). Revisiting the Triple Aim-Are we any closer to integrated health care? Physician Executive, 40(1), 40-43.
Seow, H. Y., & Sibley, L. M. (2014). Developing a dashboard to help measure and achieve the triple aim: A population-based cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 363.